"returnoftheewok;72407" wrote:
So by refuting everything you say I'm deflecting huh? Ok guy :D. .
No. When you make this story about me supposedly getting destroyed you are deflecting. When you talk about respecting the developer's decisions you are deflecting. When you literally decide to type "waaahh" you are deflecting(and embarrassing yourself).
Guess what. The developers have explicitly expressed that they like the criticism, I actually have a extremely good winrate and the only person here that is upset is you.
I am on a new server and I am a new (2 weeks) player. So far I have lost three arena matches. Chances are you have a worse winrate me by far. So let's put these silly fantasies of yours to bed shall we?
"returnoftheewok;72407" wrote:
If you're playing this game for exploration and not pvp+ranks, then you really shouldn't care about losing in pvp. And Poe is not extremely unbalanced either. I know plenty of dudes who use kylo/sid/lumi teams withoout poe that beat my team over and over again(they even snipe my team), and I use a Poe/F2p team. Your problem is really with p2p characters not Poe, because p2p characters are why you're losing consecutively, not because of Poe. Get rid of FOTP and put in Kylo/Luke/Geo etc and you'll beat them most of the time.
FOTP is more OP just looking at the stats I agree but the probelm with poe is more just one related to first turn mechanics and how speed works. Essentially a character like poe just makes like FOTP even worse. When it comes down to it, It's not a either or scenario. They can both be nerfed.
"returnoftheewok;72407" wrote:
I'm personally against the nerfing of FOTP, p2p players spent thousands of dollars, and they should be able to enjoy their OP character they purchased.
You are ok with it? Fine. The majority of the playerbase probably disagrees with you though.