Profundity Feedback
@CG_Tusken_Meathead You seem to be listening to us so here is some feedback on the Profundity. What happens for this ship is typical and happens too often unfortunately. Two days ago you posted t...
Forum Discussion
"Starslayer;c-2380743" wrote:"gflegui;c-2380563" wrote:"ConnorMcLurk;c-2380525" wrote:"gflegui;c-2380451" wrote:
Worst ship ever. It is not Exe counter. ****! Don’t waste resources
This is total crap. When you are unable to beat Exe with Profundity either your rebel ships are G1 or you play very poorly.
From my experience both ships neutralize each other pretty well. Whereas the Executor loses a lot more banners on offense against Prof than vice versa.
If you play against the setup without HT on the initial formation, then you will understand what I'm saying. The counter is reduce to RNG of your ships assiting or not. Therefore, you can kill xanadu in the first moves and everything goes well, or you can not, and they will obliterate you in seconds.
Is not a reliable counter. Is just a coin toss.
I find it easier without HT so far, but maybe I had great rng. However, I don't open with Special 2 but Special 1 against this trio.
Good, because Special 2 is only best against HT, XB, RC comps. If they changed the AI to do Special 2 first, Executor could still easily beat it. If they made it conditional, we'd still find the Executor comp that can counter the AI. I really don't think the AI needs a tweak based on what I've seen so far.
Frankly, I like how easily they can beat each other. If you have both, climbs in arena are easy. You'll have more flexibility in GAC. And LSTB fleet CM (at least in P1) went very well.
Reminds me of the Neg/Mal meta. They were reliably able to counter each other. Both had soft, off-meta counters.
