Progress?

Just characters. Some people consider that "content" and some people don't. Think about a pencil & paper role-playing game. If they introduced a booklet with a new character class, would that be new content? Pretty much everyone would say yes. But a new character in SWGOH? A lot of people say no.

There are various reasons for this, and I'm not saying I entirely disagree with the folks who say "no" (or entirely agree with the folks who say "yes"), but you should be aware that what is content to one person isn't necessarily content to another - including you.

So Kyo probably meant characters, but to Kyno that is new content. There isn't a conflict there unless you two are defining "content" differently ... which you do appear to be doing.

"MasterSeedy;c-2099619" wrote:
Just characters. Some people consider that "content" and some people don't. Think about a pencil & paper role-playing game. If they introduced a booklet with a new character class, would that be new content? Pretty much everyone would say yes. But a new character in SWGOH? A lot of people say no.

There are various reasons for this, and I'm not saying I entirely disagree with the folks who say "no" (or entirely agree with the folks who say "yes"), but you should be aware that what is content to one person isn't necessarily content to another - including you.

So Kyo probably meant characters, but to Kyno that is new content. There isn't a conflict there unless you two are defining "content" differently ... which you do appear to be doing.

Just using the word content spans everything in the game for me, but I know people use it in different ways to mean different things.

To me there are 3 forms of content:
1. Characters/ships
2. Character/ships progression (gear/relics/mods/ability mats)
3. Playable content (any game mode where you fight with your characters)

Seems we’ve gotten a lot more of 1-2 than 3 this past year ?

I know not everyone thinks this is content but I really enjoy the new levels of the assualt battles and that tier 2 especially requires a little bit of work to get it right.

"Monel;c-2099628" wrote:
I know not everyone thinks this is content but I really enjoy the new levels of the assualt battles and that tier 2 especially requires a little bit of work to get it right.

Definitely playable content. Not playable or achievable for the masses, but definitely caters to a larger % of the player base than LSgeoTB.

"Mephisto_style;c-2099582" wrote:

"Akenno;c-2098367" wrote:
It really seems like they change the priority towards this new stuff. Really looking forward to the Road Ahead.
If it is not good, it may be the end until they do our stuff.
This feature really determine the future of this game.

Actually, if they simply upped the GAC and TW frequency 5× the community would probably shut up. The 2 funnest game modes have this paltry spread over a month.

5x????

"Mephisto_style;c-2099582" wrote:

"Akenno;c-2098367" wrote:
It really seems like they change the priority towards this new stuff. Really looking forward to the Road Ahead.
If it is not good, it may be the end until they do our stuff.
This feature really determine the future of this game.

Actually, if they simply upped the GAC and TW frequency 5× the community would probably shut up. The 2 funnest game modes have this paltry spread over a month.

the two least funnest imo, especially considering the rewards vs time required

"Gifafi;c-2099745" wrote:

"Mephisto_style;c-2099582" wrote:

"Akenno;c-2098367" wrote:
It really seems like they change the priority towards this new stuff. Really looking forward to the Road Ahead.
If it is not good, it may be the end until they do our stuff.
This feature really determine the future of this game.

Actually, if they simply upped the GAC and TW frequency 5× the community would probably shut up. The 2 funnest game modes have this paltry spread over a month.

the two least funnest imo, especially considering the rewards vs time required

Just curious, if GAC and TW are the least fun to you then what are the most fun game modes to you?

As far as time vs rewards, I spend about the same amount of time on a single GAC match as I do fighting 8 waves of an assault battle, but find GAC far more fun and rewarding.

I don’t like GAC or TW either. Prefer TB.

"LordDirt;c-2099822" wrote:
I don’t like GAC or TW either. Prefer TB.

I like GAC, TW, DSgeoTB and raids in their first several months. Those are fun to me.

I dislike all the raids now, don’t have much time to attack and play around, LSgeoTB and arenas are boring and I only like the crystals and zeta mats. Assault battles are ok, but time consuming beyond what they should be, like the rewards though.

as afew have said above, in the general sense or in a general conversation, to me, yes it is content. if you look at the game from 0-100% of where any player is now and where they started I would say that above 75% of what they have interacted (gearing, planning, theory crafting, and other none game play things) with in that time is characters.

-----
I also think that while this is a fair question, relating the long timeline they have said they have to the answers in the QA that were answered with "not at this time" doesn't really correlate. I wouldn't think that not at this time, is in reference to the 3-5 year plan they have mentioned, but more just on the immediate plan and what is actually in the works.

they have discussed the long term plan is very "fuzzy" and as things get discussed and approach things they clear up and add more details. example would be- if they had May 4th noted on the calendar last year, they may not have had ESB as a direct thing being focused on.