Q&A: Sandbagging Response

"DarjeloSalas;c-2024050" wrote:
@EventineElessedil - my goodness you were on a roll last night.

No, I was not claiming it took me 5 seconds to go through 13 pages. I said I found evidence of what you have been denying is possible in 5 seconds, solely looking at the 13th page.

Specifically, I mean this post and follow up:


So that’s 46 signed up facing 35 or 36. A difference of at least 10.

I’ll await your skewed interpretation of this and pithy remarks, because it looks unlikely you’ll apologise and admit you were wrong.

I know, right? Far too much time on this topic. Suffice it to say I already conceded that my previous understanding of numbers of TW registered players may not have been correct. See here:

"EventineElessedil;c-2023880" wrote:
So here you go: you are right.

You don't like the level of detail in my post, or the way I write, that's okay neither do I. I do my best. The problem is that it's a complicated subject when you start thinking about it, but you are free to not think about it if that's your preferred approach. There is a difference between having a productive, enlightening discussion and slinging insults, a concept that not many people seem to understand these days. I don't know why this discussion should hurt your feelings and require an apology. Have a nice day.