Reality of AI dodge, complete statistics
I recorded every single attack in my GW tonight. And the initial results are promising. I did not count Sid or Phasma's AOE attacks. Because they do so little damage, I can't tell when they hit or...
Forum Discussion
"leef;479193" wrote:
I dont think dodge is a good way to proof anything, too many factors weigh in on whether a attack is dodged or not. If you want to proof AI does or does not have an advantage, tracking phasma assists is the way to go.
- Only track phasma leads with her leader abi maxed
- Dont track any FO attacks/assists (phasma herself included)
- Dont track Aayla attacks/assists
- Dont track teams with Echo
- Dont track dooku's and kit fisto's "bonus attacks"
- Disregard the assists provided by QGJ, GS, Tusken Raider etc ( you should count double assists where one is provided by Phasma)
- Track total attacks, total assists called in by phasma for both your team and AI seperatly
This should provide a clear percentage of assists for AI and human controlled teams. Not influenced by base assists ratings like base dodge ratings, or buffs/debuffs like dodge, or unique's on the receiving end of the assist.
Tracking those things won't bunk the most commonly stated theory - AI has a higher dodge chance.
