"Ultra;c-1987272" wrote:
Crumb said it is a software bug
TopHat said it was an unintentional consequence. The people that investigated the issue are calling it a screw up should be proof enough
Not when the people investigating it have a strong incentive to spin it as best they can for cg. If an independent investigation determined that it was a bug, that would be evidence.
But having a cg employee say it's a bug really proves nothing.
It really comes down to how much you trust their words based on their actions.
Right now, I trust their words very little.