Replace a round of 3 vs 3 with this.
3 vs 3 is substantially worse than 5 vs 5 and although I have come to terms with 3 vs 3 I think many would like to see its role diminished. I would suggest a new form of GAC with a new map call Big 3....
Forum Discussion
I dislike 3v3 so count me in w/ supporting reddit data.
That said, while I don't think the idea of 1-team defense is a great one, I sort of like the idea of classifying a zone by faction.
Would be interesting to see a zone that didn't have Jabba, LV, JMK, & Rey all forming a wall of GLs.
It might also be interesting to "blend" the teams instead of rotating the event, so something like 5v5 in the front & 3v3 in the back zone which is faction mixed.
Actually the more I think about it........
4 Zones:
LS 5v5
DS 5v5
Mixed 3v3
Fleet
And then "Randomize" the placement for each GAC.
LS & Fleet up front one time... DS & 3v3 as a top back/front another, etc etc.
Not sure how much the coding would need to change to account for the Blend & the Rotation, but, it would make things more interesting each month IMO.
That said, while I don't think the idea of 1-team defense is a great one, I sort of like the idea of classifying a zone by faction.
Would be interesting to see a zone that didn't have Jabba, LV, JMK, & Rey all forming a wall of GLs.
It might also be interesting to "blend" the teams instead of rotating the event, so something like 5v5 in the front & 3v3 in the back zone which is faction mixed.
Actually the more I think about it........
4 Zones:
LS 5v5
DS 5v5
Mixed 3v3
Fleet
And then "Randomize" the placement for each GAC.
LS & Fleet up front one time... DS & 3v3 as a top back/front another, etc etc.
Not sure how much the coding would need to change to account for the Blend & the Rotation, but, it would make things more interesting each month IMO.
Community Highlights
- CG_Meathead3 months ago
Capital Games Team
- CG_Meathead2 years ago
