Rose tico. Why? Just why?

"G20;d-198975" wrote:
Hello, I believe I speak for everyone in the swgoh nation.

You totally don’t.

Sorry to shatter your beliefs.

;)

I hope she's needed for an event, and anything less then 7 stars, zetad and g12 won't do. Then they could release a pack for a bargain £40 to help you gear her up quickly ;)

Who?
What if we all agreed to never mention her name again? Maybe that way she finally disappears.

I like rose. I farmed her and holdo when they came out and use them on offence in GA/TW effectively every event

"BaldingHead90;c-1812849" wrote:

"DocileHoneybadger;c-1812848" wrote:

"G20;d-198975" wrote:
Hello, I believe I speak for everyone in the swgoh nation.

You totally don’t.

Sorry to shatter your beliefs.

It's a joke my guy, relax

Hehe. “Sorry to shatter your beliefs” wasn’t a strong enough indication of a return joke? I’ll add a smiley

;)

I realy believe that Disney forced CG to bring Rose into the game.
And to show us that the devs dont like this character as well, they made her kit this shitty...
But just my guess.

She's not that bad if you max her.

My GA opponent has a g12 Rose that he uses on his arena team lol.

I can't understand all the hate on Rose's character. I mean, the sequels (and the characters included) are the part of Star Wars that I like least of all, but come on. Her backstory is even more profound than Rey's, she's not a Mary Sue and has an understandable reason to fight. She might be a little naive, but still one of of the more interesting sequel characters.

"CadoaBane;c-1814419" wrote:
I can't understand all the hate on Rose's character. I mean, the sequels (and the characters included) are the part of Star Wars that I like least of all, but come on. Her backstory is even more profound than Rey's, she's not a Mary Sue and has an understandable reason to fight. She might be a little naive, but still one of of the more interesting sequel characters.

I think one of the main reasons why people don't like her is that the 8th episode clearly sends a signal that her character was chosen -how to put it in the least offensive way- for non-movie related reasons. She's there to send a message, she's there so that the company can keep a favourable image on it's entire market. But that's about the whole thing she does for the movie: she is there.

You could cut her entire story arc and the movie wouldn't change. All her scenes are simply fillers. As much as people call Rey a Mary Sue, or Kylo a whiny, emo copy of a wannabe Vader, at least their arc is what defines the movie.
Rose is obviously not one of the main characters, but that shouldn't render all her scenes senseless and forgettable. In the OT, Lando is more of a secondary character, yet you couldn't really cut him from the movies, could you? Now, you can't really say the same about any scene of Finn and Rose in the Last Jedi.