Since Rey likely isn't a Jedi...
...and instead will be a "balanced" Force user (per Luke in the EP8 teaser trailer), how will she be labeled when EA/CG finally brings her Force version to the game as a playable toon? Maybe it's time...
Forum Discussion
"Tatebomb;c-1019407" wrote:"Woodroward;c-1019396" wrote:"Mullato;c-1019384" wrote:
Lmao, that's not not how it works buddy.
You are trying to convince everyone that Something happened. Everyone else is saying that Nothing happened. You dont have to provide proof when Nothing happens.
This is like everyone telling you that trees can't jump, but you are telling us that one time you think you saw a tree jump. Who do you think needs to provide proof in that case? Exactly, if nothing happens there is no proof necessary, if something happens, then proof is necessary.
As it stands, this isn't looking good for the case or not of you being a troll or delusional. Because there is plenty of proof in this thread of that.
IF I was trying to convince anyone of anything. That would be the case. But I have stated over and over again that that isn't the case. I am trying to convince NO ONE of ANYTHING.
You ARE trying to convince me of something. That means the burden of proof falls to you, and that is EXACTLY how it works.
Maybe you should look into the burden of proof a little bit.
Rey had a jedi tag and a lightsaber 3 months ago. No one saw it but me and they quickly removed it though. Prove me wrong.
Oh, wow I must of missed that, but since you remember it happening then it must be true.
"Woodroward;c-1019418" wrote:"Mullato;c-1019404" wrote:"Woodroward;c-1019396" wrote:"Mullato;c-1019384" wrote:
Lmao, that's not not how it works buddy.
You are trying to convince everyone that Something happened. Everyone else is saying that Nothing happened. You dont have to provide proof when Nothing happens.
This is like everyone telling you that trees can't jump, but you are telling us that one time you think you saw a tree jump. Who do you think needs to provide proof in that case? Exactly, if nothing happens there is no proof necessary, if something happens, then proof is necessary.
As it stands, this isn't looking good for the case or not of you being a troll or delusional. Because there is plenty of proof in this thread of that.
IF I was trying to convince anyone of anything. That would be the case. But I have stated over and over again that that isn't the case. I am trying to convince NO ONE of ANYTHING.
You ARE trying to convince me of something. That means the burden of proof falls to you, and that is EXACTLY how it works.
Maybe you should look into the burden of proof a little bit.
Nope troll, you are trying to convince everyone of something happening. In this case it's something "mysteriously appearing in game, and then mysteriously disappearing."
If you are not trying to convince us of anything, then what exactly are you doing?
Ohhhh right, being a troll.
I mentioned something I saw. People told me I didn't see it. People addressed me. I responded.
If I had addressed you all, you'd have a foot to stand on when you call me a troll, but I didn't you all addressed me. Ipso Facto, you are the trolls.
Quiet troll, no one cares about your gibberish.
