Since Rey likely isn't a Jedi...

"Tatebomb;c-1025402" wrote:

"Mullato;c-1025376" wrote:

"SlabRankle;c-1024433" wrote:
I would be happy with 100% less magic Good Guy crystals, prophecies, and midichrolrians in Star Wars.

"Woodroward;c-1025352" wrote:

"Tatebomb;c-1025185" wrote:

"Jizzaouse;c-1025178" wrote:

"Tatebomb;c-1025104" wrote:

"Jizzaouse;c-1025038" wrote:
15 minutes. I realize we all knew he was never a sith, but how much time was wasted bickering back and forth? I would say more than 15 minutes. The point is, its not appropriate to tell someone they are wrong then provide no hard evidence. This highlights a serious problem we have in modern society, which is why i decided to dedicate 15 minutes of my time to this "crusade". ;)

You're making a huge assumption. And that is it will do any good. He made it clear that unless you have screenshots for every single day he won't accept it as proof. And even then it's doubtful.

Doesn't really matter. Some people still thing the earth is flat apparently, regardless of the proof. You can only present reasonable evidence and move on. My point was no reasonable evidence was ever submitted in the first place. Since that has now been done the rest doesn't matter.

There was screenshots of him when he was first released and links to multiple threads posted about no sith tag during the time frame so I would say reasonable evidence was presented.

Threads are not reasonable evidence. The screenshots that were posted earlier were outside the specific timeframe I referenced having seen it: From December to February. Who in their right mind would take a photo from a year ago as proof he didn't have it three months ago?

This man did provide screenshots from December and February, and I had said i would accept proof with photos from December, January, and February (not every day, that was your own idea). I clearly outlined what I considered proof, and this is the first guy that even attempted to do so.

Others (like yourself) found it much more important to pad their own ego and hurl ridicule than to try to contribute to the conversation.

@Jizzaouse thanks for the photos. I gladly accept them as proof of what they are, but I did really ask for one from January too, so until I see one from then as well, I can not admit something I don't see as having been proven. That would at least cover all the months of the time frame I suggested and I would accept it.

I'm glad that someone finally paid attention to what I was saying instead of heaping more ridicule for not going along with popular opinion.

All that being said, I had hoped for this conversation to die rather than have to deal with the troll posters on the topic again.

LMAO

that is all.

Basically this.

Yeah, the fact that you chose to laugh and joke about it rather than provide reasonable evidence was exactly the problem.

So go ahead and LYAO, that was the problem to begin with... that you didn't take me seriously.