Sith Lord Vader next GL?

"Sithari9;c-2269282" wrote:

"Jo0121;c-2269277" wrote:

"Sithari9;c-2269268" wrote:

"Jo0121;c-2269266" wrote:

"YetiYeti;c-2269260" wrote:

"Jo0121;c-2268921" wrote:

"YetiYeti;c-2268916" wrote:

"Jo0121;c-2268913" wrote:
Well I am happy about it. Kenobi/Vader pair is something I was looking forward ever since GLs were introduced.

Besides, no one forces you guys to farm him. You have 5 other options.

As for whether he deserves GL status or not, he is one of the main characters in prequels, and saga as while. He arguably did more on screen in ROTS than SEE and JML.

... and SEE/JML were the 'final forms' of their characters.

Whopper Jr wasn't/isn't.

And? Neither is Kenobi.

You can argue that Kenobi's "character" as a Jedi Master was over at that point.... Whereas Lord Vader specifically was just beginning in ROTS

Semantics.

"Sithari9;c-2269261" wrote:

"Jo0121;c-2269258" wrote:

"Sithari9;c-2269257" wrote:

"Solus_Imperius;c-2268696" wrote:

"Curtismathew;c-2268689" wrote:
Why would Vader have to be “Empire”? The first Galactic Empire is only declared at the very end. Vader (which ever version, pre suit or Lord or whatever) can still be Sith - which is the opposite or counter to GLK Jedi.

No.
Kenobi is the Galactic Republic Legend.
This means his counterpoint will be Seperatist or Empire.
We have a Sith GL already.
Furthermore:
"I have brought peace, justice, freedom, and security to my new Empire."

The Galactic Republic becomes the Empire so there is no true opposition. GL Darth Maul having scoundrel synergy makes more sense against Galactic Republic. The Empire did not exist until the Republic became the Empire...

It is not going to be Maul.

Among other things, next GL will most likely require Malevolence and Maul doesn't fit there.

And so what if it did? Having Malovolence would be a direct reflection of the requirements for Kenobi to even it out. Doesn't mean Grievous is on his way with an upgrade and some cough drops

No, I don't think GG is, Vader/Anakin, however, is connected to Malevolence.

Vader is Sith and Empire. They aren't going to make another Sith GL. Empire vs Galactic Republic makes 0 sense.

And Obi-Wan is GR and Jedi.

You are saying Empire makes no sense, but Scoundrel does?

Please start thinking logically instead of thinking about what you want.

Scoundrels united under Maul vs the Republic makes a lot more sense than an angry Anakin. My point is that Empire does NOT go against the Republic, which would make "Vader" another Sith GL. We already have one, making a second one makes no sense.