"LordDirt;c-2271110" wrote:
"Narkny;c-2271109" wrote:
"LordDirt;c-2271002" wrote:
"Xcien;c-2270999" wrote:
"Devian;c-2270938" wrote:
"Rabelais;d-245948" wrote:
The blog post regarding JMK says we’ll be playing through Revenge of the Sith to acquire him, so a dark side Anakin seems like the logical choice for the next GL. Sith Lords are the opposites of Jedi Masters so I think the naming makes sense.
At that point he is UFU and not a Sith Lord, but Lord Vader. There is huge difference
He is a Sith. Palps name him a Sith lord after Mace gets hurled out the window, and then sends Anakin/Vader to the Jedi Temple to kill the Jedi. By the time Vader duels Kenobi on Mustafar, he is a Sith.
Technically Darth Vader isn't a Sith until he falls into darkness and gets his yellow eyes on.
Sorry, but this is wrong. Darth Vader was a Sith since the moment he pledged himself and got the title. What you are really referring to is being fully turned to the dark side. That's the difference. Anakin wasn't fully turned until he got the Sith yellow eyes and finished his dark deeds.
So you can be a Sith and not be turned to the dark side?
Tyranus was a Sith despite not having the yellow eyes, he was using a technique taught to him by Palpatine to mask his Sith eyes. At least in Legends that's the explanation. Vader had Sith eyes when he arrived on Mustafar and slaughtered the Separatists. Technically he was a Sith because Palpatine, the reigning Sith Master, deemed him his apprentice. When he fully committed on Mustafar that just further emphasized him being a Sith now. However I will say there was a Sith Lord named Darth Vectivus who committed no evil deeds and actually helped others, so you can be a Sith and not be fully Dark Side