"Narkny;c-2271117" wrote:
"LordDirt;c-2271110" wrote:
"Narkny;c-2271109" wrote:
"LordDirt;c-2271002" wrote:
"Xcien;c-2270999" wrote:
"Devian;c-2270938" wrote:
"Rabelais;d-245948" wrote:
The blog post regarding JMK says we’ll be playing through Revenge of the Sith to acquire him, so a dark side Anakin seems like the logical choice for the next GL. Sith Lords are the opposites of Jedi Masters so I think the naming makes sense.
At that point he is UFU and not a Sith Lord, but Lord Vader. There is huge difference
He is a Sith. Palps name him a Sith lord after Mace gets hurled out the window, and then sends Anakin/Vader to the Jedi Temple to kill the Jedi. By the time Vader duels Kenobi on Mustafar, he is a Sith.
Technically Darth Vader isn't a Sith until he falls into darkness and gets his yellow eyes on.
Sorry, but this is wrong. Darth Vader was a Sith since the moment he pledged himself and got the title. What you are really referring to is being fully turned to the dark side. That's the difference. Anakin wasn't fully turned until he got the Sith yellow eyes and finished his dark deeds.
So you can be a Sith and not be turned to the dark side?
You get turned when you pledge yourself to the Sith teachings, but that doesn't mean you have fully embraced the dark side of the Force. As Sidious tells Anakin: "Do what must be done, Lord Vader. Do not hesitate, show no mercy. Only then will you be strong enough with the dark side to save Padmé".
It's clear in the movie that Anakin is still conflicted up until he finishes his mission on Mustafar and has his eyes turned yellow, showcasing his turn to the dark side being complete.
Didn’t reallly look that conflicted when he was leading the slaughter in the temple.