Sith Lord Vader next GL?

"Nauros;c-2276088" wrote:

"Xcien;c-2276065" wrote:

"NormalSizedAnnie;c-2276016" wrote:

"ssj4tim;c-2276014" wrote:

"Kiaowew;c-2275888" wrote:

"ssj4tim;c-2275871" wrote:
I think fallen anakin would make the most sense and introduce a new faction, "dark jedi" and have synergies with them. There seems to be enough in the game that would qualify for that title and not break up SEE teams really.

Not fallen Anakin, but Lord Vader, for one thing. And secondly, "dark jedi"? Why such a stupid name? There's a lot of different names out there and you try something so weak

"Kiaowew;c-2275888" wrote:

"ssj4tim;c-2275871" wrote:
I think fallen anakin would make the most sense and introduce a new faction, "dark jedi" and have synergies with them. There seems to be enough in the game that would qualify for that title and not break up SEE teams really.

Not fallen Anakin, but Lord Vader, for one thing. And secondly, "dark jedi"? Why such a stupid name? There's a lot of different names out there and you try something so weak

Well Lord Vader would have to be in the suit already and then it wouldn't fit the prequel theme they have going on. As for Dark Jedi, that's something that's been used tons in the star wars universe including games like kotor that this game has the actual characters that were called Dark Jedi.

He was dubbed Lord Vader prior to the suit.

Would the inquisitors be considered “dark Jedi”?

Technically the Inquisitors would be, but if they were to make it into the game, they would be Unaligned Force User (most likely). And for the Lord Vader tag debate, they probably wouldn't add the "Dark Jedi" tag, they would probably put Sith, seeing as Vader was a Sith.

If Inquisitors make it to the game, they will be Inquisitors. UFU makes no sense.