Slave I: Taunt is Silly
Is there any justification for CG to continue keeping the taunt on Slave I? The ship is an attacker and squishy. No taunt would also likely make a nice diff with Exec with some of the counters that ha...
Forum Discussion
"Stokat;c-2289086" wrote:
Agreed. For a ship that is that squishy (and also has the attacker tag, not tank) to have taunt as reinforcement ability doesn’t make a lot of sense. They could just have replaced the taunt with going into stealth or something, or even just removed it. It is supposed to be the hunter, not the prey.
Recall he often hid out of plain site, or at least tried to. Stealth would have been perfect.
