Forum Discussion

DarkHelmetBnB's avatar
4 days ago

Stardust Transmission recommendation

I know a lot of people in the community are feeling like they were sold a bad bag of good with Profundity.  Some are just replying that the meta changes, deal with it.  I have thought about the recent fleet meta changes for a week or so and I think I have a positive solution that will address the issue.

I feel that people's expectation of Profundity begins with the experience provided in the fleet mastery event.  If we make the fleet mastery event more consistent with the in-game experience, people will have more realistic expectations on Profundity's performance in the meta.

I propose the following changes to the Stardust Transmission event:

1.  Replace the Malevolence fleet with the Leviathan fleet and ensure that the recently adjusted TIE Dagger is in the starting lineup.  This will provide players the opportunity to have a realistic experience prior to unlocking the ship in game.

2.  The bonus tier of the Stardust Transmission event has four starting ships on the opposing Executor team.  This was initially felt to be a little unfair for some people, especially without having the use of Han's Millennium Falcon.  With proper strategy, you could easily overcome this obstacle.  I propose they add the Punishing One to the opponent's starting lineup as well.  This will provide numerous benefits to the Profundity fleet owner including not having to guess what the opponent may reinforce.  It will also give you more choices of ships to target at the beginning of the battle.  More choices present more paths to success for the customer and is obviously a better experience.  In addition, it should approximate the win rate you will see in Fleet Arena and Grand Arena Championship.

I really feel these two changes will fix the "Profundity issue" many users are currently experiencing.  Feel free to comment and I will post my proposed fixes for the Chimaera counter later this week.

May the force serve you well. 

No RepliesBe the first to reply