Stop with the Inquisitorius Galactic Challenges
We get it. You want us to whale on inquisitors. However, you didn’t even do this many GCs with mandos. Just stop.
\"CG_Tusken_Meathead;c-2375187\" wrote:
So, what is your favorite GC?
\"CG_Tusken_Meathead;c-2375187\" wrote:
So, what is your favorite GC?
\"CG_Tusken_Meathead;c-2375154\" wrote:
Im gonna take over this thread for a moment and ask a question:
What is your favorite GC and what things about that GC do you like specifically? Be as detailed as possible.
\"CG_Tusken_Meathead;c-2375154\" wrote:
Im gonna take over this thread for a moment and ask a question:
What is your favorite GC and what things about that GC do you like specifically? Be as detailed as possible.
\"CG_Tusken_Meathead;c-2375187\" wrote:\"Salatious_Scrum;c-2375185\" wrote:
@CG_Tusken_Meathead
My favorite GC’s are the one that provide a challenge to my roster, not my wallet. Like the most recent fleet one was fine, since it required people to think outside of the box.
I get it that new factions need to be promoted. I’m fine with that, after all it’s how money is generated. There is a point though that it just becomes annoying. When the Mandolorian faction was added, there were GCs that required them but it was nowhere near the scale the Inquisitor GCs are being pushed.
So, what is your favorite GC?
\"CG_Tusken_Meathead;c-2375187\" wrote:\"Salatious_Scrum;c-2375185\" wrote:
@CG_Tusken_Meathead
My favorite GC’s are the one that provide a challenge to my roster, not my wallet. Like the most recent fleet one was fine, since it required people to think outside of the box.
I get it that new factions need to be promoted. I’m fine with that, after all it’s how money is generated. There is a point though that it just becomes annoying. When the Mandolorian faction was added, there were GCs that required them but it was nowhere near the scale the Inquisitor GCs are being pushed.
So, what is your favorite GC?
\"CG_Tusken_Meathead;c-2375207\" wrote:
What specifics about those GCs did you like?
\"CG_Tusken_Meathead;c-2375207\" wrote:
What specifics about those GCs did you like?
\"Gale_Toral;c-2375212\" wrote:
I'm gonna go out on a limb here and say that complaints about these GCs are not fully warranted.
The BIGGEST thing about GCs are the omicron materials. We have been able to get the omicrons from every single Inquisitor GC since they started, mostly with g8/9 Inqs, just doing tier 6, then getting the rest of the feats in tier 10 to secure the tier 9 box. You're only missing out on a few mod slicing materials.
The main downside of having had so many Inq GCs for me is just the repetitiveness of the feats. It's much the same challenge with a new backdrop every time. Maybe just lower the frequency a bit now that they have been out for a while (or just change the theme to Rogue One :P)
I like those GCs where it feels like a puzzle to work out tier 10. A recent one was Clones vs Sith I think. I had to be clever with my application of exposes from Bad Batch to control everyone's turn meter to avoid the Sith getting a lot of turns and overpowering me.
\"Gale_Toral;c-2375212\" wrote:
I'm gonna go out on a limb here and say that complaints about these GCs are not fully warranted.
The BIGGEST thing about GCs are the omicron materials. We have been able to get the omicrons from every single Inquisitor GC since they started, mostly with g8/9 Inqs, just doing tier 6, then getting the rest of the feats in tier 10 to secure the tier 9 box. You're only missing out on a few mod slicing materials.
The main downside of having had so many Inq GCs for me is just the repetitiveness of the feats. It's much the same challenge with a new backdrop every time. Maybe just lower the frequency a bit now that they have been out for a while (or just change the theme to Rogue One :P)
I like those GCs where it feels like a puzzle to work out tier 10. A recent one was Clones vs Sith I think. I had to be clever with my application of exposes from Bad Batch to control everyone's turn meter to avoid the Sith getting a lot of turns and overpowering me.
