Forum Discussion
7 years ago
"Nikoms565;c-1482373" wrote:"Kyno;c-1482358" wrote:"tRRRey;c-1482342" wrote:"Kyno;c-1482298" wrote:"Nikoms565;c-1482280" wrote:
I love the "we didn't really play test this enough" hotfixes. :D
with a community this big, we do play test this game more in 1 day then they can in certain periods of time.
So you're telling me CG didn't think about doing an open beta test on the Sith raid like they did with TW?
They needed numbers to push out TW and test it at somewhat near its limits, for both the server handling and the event.
Raids dont require numbers to do testing. They missed one, considering all the mechanics at work, I'm not happy but I think that's not so bad.
The only odd part is that the one they missed also just happens to be the log-in character the same month the raid is released. You don't find that even a little bit...odd?
I believe in coincidence - but when EA is involved, they just seem to be very strange coincidences.
too true. I want to think this was somewhat intentional and that he was "meant to be a key" toon in this raid. with all the changes they have made to reduce our old tricks, TM gain does seem to strategy for this raid. but if this were true i can't imagine they would have not tied this and figured out they could lock him into this position.
About SWGOH General Discussion
Discuss and share your feedback on Star Wars: Galaxy of Heroes with fellow players.
78,106 PostsLatest Activity: 26 minutes agoRelated Posts
Recent Discussions
- 26 minutes ago
- 2 hours ago