50 Teams per zone for a 380M GP guild? Are you guys understanding that the most of us has a Real-Life?No issues to increase the teams, but double that? And the Offensive Time is still the same?

So, TW just came on and I saw we need a staggering 38 squads per zone! Okay, unexpected, but fine. However...• My guild (275M GP, 261.2M active, 47/50 sign-ups) needs 38 squads per zone. EDIT: Our opponent is 330M GP.• My friend's guild (332M GP, 326M active, 49/50 sign-ups) needs 37 squads per zone. EDIT: Their opponent is 335M GP.I'd love to know if this is working as intended.

Our 320M guild is matched up against a 356M guild. Fantastic job CG, just an excellent improvement! I see you are really, truly are putting in the work to improve the game. sigh

"Zouss57;c-2303232" wrote:"Frankto;c-2303227" wrote:So, TW just came on and I saw we need a staggering 38 squads per zone! Okay, unexpected, but fine. However...• My guild (275M GP, 261.2M active, 47/50 sign-ups) needs 38 squads per zone.• My friend's guild (332M GP, 326M active, 49/50 sign-ups) needs 37 squads per zone.I'd love to know if this is working as intended. looks good, the 2 guilds are in the 250/350 interval60M less active GP resulting in 1 more team per zone is okay?

Great fix CG, can't say i'm surprised. First match up our 287M GP guild matched up with a 351M GP guild. 178 GLs to our 66. Should be proud of yourselves.Edit: we were rewarded for all our members joining 49/50 with this. 39 sets per zone.

Well done. 360M with 49 subscribed and 39 teams req here. My TW officers got a heart attack and we're warming up jawas, ewoks and tuskens from the bench.Serious CG? Guess you're kinda outsourcing some stuff to some questionable low cost software houses...

TW - MM and Teams needed [MERGE] | EA Forums

Jimbo3772
4 years ago
We're facing a 60 mil GP difference...seeing reports all over discord of similar match-ups. They actually made sandbagging even easier, somehow, and also gave incentive to sandbag with the way they set up the R9 mats.
mikebpiz
4 years ago
"Joebo720;c-2303274" wrote:
"Ultra;c-2303272" wrote:
"Joebo720;c-2303269" wrote:
"Ultra;c-2303265" wrote:
GL ratio 1:1 is unreasonable to expect

What is reasonable then after they nerfed GL counters? Would love to know.

Its an uphill battle, but not impossible to win against

Oh Yeah, you think? Enlighten me.

Ours is ridiculous but this one is just laughable.

This needs to be reverted ASAP.
mikebpiz
4 years ago
We are a 380 million guild with 48 active against a 440 million guild with 50 active.

Seriously who thought this was better matchmaking
znihilist
4 years ago
"Pluto154;c-2303310" wrote:
Post above, gets kinda ridiculous with sandbagging intentional or not.
181 Gls vs 106. 21 7* exec vs 7 5* exec.
How you supposed to compete against something with that big of a gap. 900k gp is a lot more relicd toons

That's equivalent to 5 to 7 more reliced teams.
BeeblebroxRocks
4 years ago
"Drathuk916;c-2303305" wrote:
263 million active gp 35 teams per sector 43 signed up. 8.1 teams per player on a 6.1 million avg roster.

Well, 16.2 teams per player really since we're apparently also expected to attack after placing so many squads! It's a joke
ManlyVanLee
New Novice
4 years ago
I love it. We might actually have to use characters outside of the same 5 teams we use every TW
TheCLPhenomenon
4 years ago
Is this working as intended?

60M GP difference and they did not sandbag. They are full strength at 435M per one of their members.
Degs29
4 years ago
"Ultra;c-2303214" wrote:

That would have been useful to have 2 days ago....
znihilist
4 years ago
"Clphenom;c-2303327" wrote:
Is this working as intended?

60M GP difference and they did not sandbag. They are full strength at 435M per one of their members.

They will say no, but this is WAI. They want guilds be matched with guilds from different divisions (They said so in the post from yesterday). I don't think they really had any thought into the consequences of this specific change.
Rath_Tarr0
4 years ago
"Nauros;c-2303332" wrote:
Note that the increased number of defenses is more punishing to the guild that joins in lower numbers. Not sure if it will be enough to discourage sandbagging, though...

GL walls with trash behind them. If the opponent can't get through the wall they'll never see the trash.