"Kyno;c-2256939" wrote:
"Zedstar;c-2256935" wrote:
"DarjeloSalas;c-2256931" wrote:
"Zedstar;c-2256929" wrote:
"UdalCuain;c-2256928" wrote:
"Zedstar;c-2256926" wrote:
"UdalCuain;c-2256921" wrote:
It's not always sandbagging.
How many defence slots you having to set? And have you definitely got the right guild? There's a few alliances out there that make tiny adjustments to the guild names.
Defence slots is 22 and we went in with a full guild so they 100% sand bagged
Again, it's not necessarily sandbagging. People have real lives. Everyone is really quick to accuse people of trying to cheat the system. I shouldn't have signed up for this TW as I have assignments due, but I did. We still are only going into TW with 40 as lots of guildies have stuff on this week.
ok ok yes maybe there is a chance its not sand bagging but all routes point to it is, but yes i agree there is a very slim chance that it might not be.... but lets face it we all know it is
No we don’t. Please stop with your “100% sandbagged” drivel.
My guild (320M GP) are fighting this war with 41/50 signed up. There is nothing deliberate about it.
In lots of high end guilds TW is optional, because people who sign up but can’t commit to being available to attack are a liability.
Yes, the matchmaking sucks and needs addressed, but spouting blandishments about deliberate sandbagging when you know nothing of the sort is not helping the discussion.
I just said it might not be sandbagging, but all fingers point to it.... if the match making system was changed to Guild GP and not signed up GP it would solve all the problems
But yes it might not be sand bagging.... but sorry in this case i think it is
but there is no proof either way so you might be right and so might i
What this comes down to is, do you want to discuss how they got there so you can try to bash another guild and keep calling it sandbagging or "all fingers point to" anything, or would you rather have a fruitful constructive conversation about ways to change things?
------
No, it should not be guild GP, that punishes guilds that do not want to force players to join or kick someone out who just had a kid and may not eb able to play at a moment's notice for a while. Players have lives and this was a great addition to the game mode.
We are all entitled to an opinion mate, i personally believe the match making system is ridiculously flawed and a lot of guilds do sand bag now whether the one we are facing are or whether lucky for them they had a lot of illness or players working etc etc who knows
I have looked at the records and stats and its funny how nearly all of their last 7 TW; s there has only been 22 defence slots... seems strange that a guild of 360m would acceptable around 6/7 player who regularly sit out of tw battles, but hey I have no proof they are sand bagging or not the same as you have no evidence to say they are or not..... that’s why in my opinion they are sand bagging
But the bottom line is the match making and CG need to fix it so that sand bagging isn't an option guilds can use to cheat as everyone knows that this does happen in the game and that is fact.
And yes im very happy to dissus with anyone on how we can make TW match making better for all guilds, looking at how many posts there are just this year on the subject says that it is something CG should be looking to fix asap
