"Underdog" GAC feat is inappropriate during 3v3

3 battles each round, 4 rounds in the season, that's 12 battles in total. 1 undersized win in each matchup. Obviously it's too hard to send in Malak vs clones or leave 1 ship slot open. Totally undoable.

"ScorchingBac0n;c-2033162" wrote:
I haven't even had the chance to underdog, because everyone has gone defense heavy so far.

Only bring 3 reinforcements into a ship fight instead of the full 4. That counts.

You can get 12 this way, and between the occasional person who goes defense light and the times you only manage to kill 2 characters on your first try (undersize squad only checks the size of your winning team, it doesn't care if you take 1, 2, or 45 tries to win) you should be able to complete the requirements.

That said, to clarify what I said earlier (because you know you're wrong when Baby Yoda agrees with you) I mean don't get bogged down trying some of THESE feats. I'm not concerning myself with using Veteran Smugglers, and I'm not worried about undersized wins. Not if it means risking losing, which now gives 2000 points--significantly more than even the most rewarding feat.

(I do anything that gives a portrait, though--gimme that sweet, sweet Resistance content!)

@littleMAC77

you have more possible battles to fight, so why should the number of undersized wins decrease?

@richardchambers

I will admit this is somehwhat lazy on CGs part, however, you could easily argue the increase in teams balances it out

This criticism you've both articulated is fair. I honestly hadn't thought about that initially. I'm also getting defense-heavy squads so far, but it's true that with just one opponent going offense-heavy you can rack up a bunch of 2 v 3 wins in a single round. That's a good thing to think about.

"Rath_Tarr;c-2033099" wrote:

"littleMAC77;c-2033070" wrote:

"MasterSeedy;c-2033056" wrote:

What, did you expect cg to come rushing in and change the feat because some poster said it was harder for reasons?

Nope. I expected them to change the feat before I ever posted here to make something more relevant to the 3v3 environment.

3v3 is a different beast, and they obviously change a bunch of the feats with every new GAC, so why does it take a random player to inform CG that 67% is less than 80%?

Because the feat is still a challenge, just because you think the math proves it shouldnt exist doesnt mean it is no longer appropriate. Tell me, has anyone made an actual argument against these feats other than this math? Because this math means nothing. Traya is a hard counter to bugs, yet her team is 60% of their team (and 50% if you factor in brute).

Taking that example, a comparably powered Triumvirate can 3v6 bugs. Can the same be said of 2v4?

yes