I really hope that CG doesn't use this feat next time they hold a 3v3 GAC. They need to come up with something else for those tournaments. It's not that you can't get any underdog victories, but your ability to do so is severely constrained, and people who would normally complete this easily will fail ... Playing 4 on 5 is just very seriously different than playing 2 on 3. Or, I suppose, if they have to use the underdog category, they can cut the number of UD victories required for the feat in half - that's probably about the same level of difficulty. As it is, I'm not even trying for underdog wins.

I never have problems under sizing 3v3...always be a few teams each round you can do it to

While that may be true for you, it's objectively harder if you have 66% of the opponent's toons instead of 80%. It's also objectively harder in the sense that what really sends squad strength up is not the individual toon, but the synergies. With only 2 toons, there's minimal opportunity for developing synergy. With 4, there's room for plenty of interactions.

Ships are a way to get undersized victories.But in regular battles, it's in fact a LOT harder to be sure. Only thing that comes to mind is Nest vs Ewoks.

You kidding right? It's quite easy to underdog... Got 7 underdog wins just with the first round.... Play smart and efficiently and it's done....

"Daerovius;c-2032405" wrote:You kidding right? It's quite easy to underdog... Got 7 underdog wins just with the first round.... Play smart and efficiently and it's done....*Division 6 detected*

"Underdog" GAC feat is inappropriate during 3v3

34 Replies

wesmay4367
6 years ago
I never have problems under sizing 3v3...always be a few teams each round you can do it to
MasterSeedy
Seasoned Ace
6 years ago
While that may be true for you, it's objectively harder if you have 66% of the opponent's toons instead of 80%. It's also objectively harder in the sense that what really sends squad strength up is not the individual toon, but the synergies. With only 2 toons, there's minimal opportunity for developing synergy. With 4, there's room for plenty of interactions.
PhoenixMoore1982
Seasoned Newcomer
6 years ago
Ships are a way to get undersized victories.
But in regular battles, it's in fact a LOT harder to be sure. Only thing that comes to mind is Nest vs Ewoks.
TheMadJeff
6 years ago
You kidding right? It's quite easy to underdog... Got 7 underdog wins just with the first round.... Play smart and efficiently and it's done....
RSithLord
6 years ago
"Daerovius;c-2032405" wrote:
You kidding right? It's quite easy to underdog... Got 7 underdog wins just with the first round.... Play smart and efficiently and it's done....

*Division 6 detected*
austin09370
6 years ago
I read that as, "It's too hard for me, change it".

Learn to accept a challenge instead of always wanting a participation reward. With that said, it's not even difficult if you are good at the game. Another post gave you some hints.
Fitzerino514
6 years ago
"good at the game"
its not a skill based game mate, you either spend time to get a goodroster or money to get a good roster, idc about the OP really its just nothing about swgoh is about being good at the game
TheSithVicious
6 years ago
"Reyn_Khuprus;c-2032424" wrote:
"good at the game"
its not a skill based game mate, you either spend time to get a goodroster or money to get a good roster, idc about the OP really its just nothing about swgoh is about being good at the game

The truth is somewhere in between. The skill is knowing the interactions, counters, modding, kill order, etc.
But, you can know all those things and lose because you didn’t spend to get DR and Malak. Or, you can have every toon possible and send in your poorly modded DR in a mirror match and get smashed.
gjosende
6 years ago
"Austin9370;c-2032416" wrote:
I read that as, "It's too hard for me, change it".

Learn to accept a challenge instead of always wanting a participation reward. With that said, it's not even difficult if you are good at the game. Another post gave you some hints.

I read it: it's a common sense therefore I must be against it.

Then again: it is a lot more difficult to get underdog victories.

P.S.: @MasterSeedy try to use Traya + Sion against 3 Geos. Right there you got at least one.
Armaturbatyr
6 years ago
"Reyn_Khuprus;c-2032424" wrote:
"good at the game"
its not a skill based game mate, you either spend time to get a goodroster or money to get a good roster, idc about the OP really its just nothing about swgoh is about being good at the game

???lol. ‘Skill based’ - funniest joke of the century. You made my day!