"Ravens1113;c-2235584" wrote:
"Kyno;c-2235581" wrote:
"Fieldgulls;c-2235577" wrote:
With this change why is the R5 requirement still needed? It is not necessary...obviously a team below the threshold wouldn’t last long. With the intent not to have one team making 20% damage “fixed”...in the guise of helping the coordination issue...open it up.
In the original conversation about this, lowing that entry requirement would have needed an increase in difficulty. I would imagine that a similar sentiment would have been applied here. I'm not sure if anyone wants it to be even more difficult....
It is more difficult now
"StarSon;c-2235586" wrote:
"Kyno;c-2235581" wrote:
"Fieldgulls;c-2235577" wrote:
With this change why is the R5 requirement still needed? It is not necessary...obviously a team below the threshold wouldn’t last long. With the intent not to have one team making 20% damage “fixed”...in the guise of helping the coordination issue...open it up.
In the original conversation about this, lowing that entry requirement would have needed an increase in difficulty. I would imagine that a similar sentiment would have been applied here. I'm not sure if anyone wants it to be even more difficult....
Sometimes I wonder how much you think about things before you say them. For example:
"The initial conversation was that to lower the relic requirement would mean they would make it harder."
CG has made it harder and you say
"No one wants it to be harder."
What?
Logically, if they could only lower the relic gate if they made it more difficult, since they have made it more difficult, could they not now lower the relic gate?
If they would have made the original one more difficult to do that, then this change would have been on top of that, not in lieu of.
Capital Games Team
