Wat/Hoda/3PO GAC issue?
Has this been brought up on the forums and/or commented upon by the devs? I can't find any mention of it. Details can be found on Reddit, but upshot is that it seems some people are getting falsely...
Forum Discussion
"AvatarofCynicism;c-2042514" wrote:"Jack1210;c-2042511" wrote:"AvatarofCynicism;c-2042199" wrote:"Daerovius;c-2042174" wrote:"Gifafi;c-2042140" wrote:"Daerovius;c-2042137" wrote:
Quite dumb from CG, and a real **** move from the one who put them on defense... Those are the ones who should get a ban
why?
Because it gets other people banned? And setting something that get people banned IS quite a **** move...
It is entirely possible that whoever set the team just wanted to see what would happen. I don't think we've had a situation like this before were a team auto-retreats and someone gets banned.
There's this cool mode called galactic war for testing like that. It is hard to say this was not a malicious move by the guy who placed them on D.
So there's an in-game message that tells everyone who plays that if a team auto-retreats on defense in GAC, the attacking player gets insta-banned? Or there's a well publicized thread or reddit post about someone being insta-banned for the same thing? Please, point me to them. Otherwise, how would anyone know what would happen? Prove malicious intent.
How would anyone know? I literally told you, galactic war. Take a step back and logically look at it. Why would you place 3 toons on defense that you know immediately retreat without testing it out? See what happens? Well GW would give you an instant answer, so its not curiosity. Collusion? Unlikely, since the detailed post on reddit about this made it clear the attacker was surprised by the placement. Just to mess with the opponent? Seems most likely, especially since people seem to think auto-D or purposely setting one team is funny and somehow hurts CG and not the opponent. Prove anything but malicious intent
