Why do Tie breakers in GAC go to highest GP?
This doesn't make any sense, if I'm able to fight a guy to a tie but he's got over 1 million GP over me why does he get the win? It should go to lowest GP! What reason, other then they just wanna give...
Forum Discussion
"Adamklark;c-2258171" wrote:"CCyrilS;c-2258094" wrote:"Adamklark;c-2257901" wrote:"th3evo;c-2257867" wrote:"DarjeloSalas;c-2257865" wrote:
The thing I don’t like about the tiebreaker system is that it settles the outcome based on something that wasn’t used in the match itself.
It would be much better if the GP used on defence, offence or both combined was used. That way every decision the player made would have contributed to the outcome of the tie.
You go in the match with your whole roster. Just because you decided not to use some characters doesn't mean that they aren't part of the match. If a hockey players sits on the bench for the whole match he is still part of the match.
I hope you understand what I'm trying to say.
I do not necessary agree with this analogy, just because there are extras, they did not affect the match at all. The player with more GP might have extra points from gearing up Tuskens, should that be awarded compared to lower GP player who managed his roster more efficiently and focused on the 'good' teams and overcame a challange with less number of available teams?
If you get what i am trying to say.
If you have a better and more efficient roster, why did you only tie? It may only seem better to you, but by not winning, I think you just proved it is not.
?
what part is difficult?
