Why is diversity not encouraged?
Looking at the meta report this morning is just... depressing. You have three toons that are used more than 73% of the time in top teams which are obviously R2, CLS, and GK. 6 toons are used 40% of th...
Forum Discussion
"Faa;c-1284511" wrote:"aeaswen;c-1284451" wrote:
Why are you trying so hard to be wrong?
Really?"aeaswen;d-134027" wrote:
You simply cannot compete without those 6 toons or at least most of them.
You failed to prove it, I proved the opposite and then you're simply strawmanning with arguments that literally make no sense whatsoever. How do you prove your claim with "Resistance is trash man"? You don't. It only proves your lack of knowledge; they shine on the offense but struggle against R2's CA zeta in conjunction with counters."aeaswen;c-1284451" wrote:
You can't argue with the numbers man.
Then don't argue if you got nothing to support any of your claims.
I've provided you facts, not opinions. You've made the strawman. Your strawman is that a super strong, random team CAN beat CLS on offense and that proves diversity. You crushed that strawman. Great. But it doesn't prove diversity. The only thing that can prove diversity is that if there are multiple teams that are on the same level of viability. You simply cannot argue that empire or resistance teams are just as viable. They are not. Can they beat CLS on offense? Sure. But people don't run them because everybody knows THEY AREN'T AS GOOD. If they were, the usage rates would reflect that. Diversity means you have true teams that compete on even ground and potentially even counter each other. For a brief moment in time, you might have been able to argue that zader, zaul and rex provided a bit of diversity. But then it died. Hard. And most that have CLS argue that he isn't gamebreaking. I have him and he is game breaking. I went from 40th to 10th just by getting him. Am I better now than I was playing Zader? Nope. I spent $20 to get Old Ben to 7* so I could get CLS. Congrats me on my wonderful strategy.
