If there's one thing worse than bad game design, it's negative feedback that doesn't give any critical advice or highlights problems or ways to improve the problems...just saying.
I feel there are problems with GAC, but 5v5 GAC is what's keeping me here.
And if CG wants to pay my consulting fee, I'll be happy to tell them what needs to be fixed, the issues with their priority of effort, their resource allocation failures, and so on.
BUT, it wouldn't matter anyway because EA is telling them what they'll be doing, so what I have to offer as part of that wouldn't matter. And, I'm a paying customer, so I'll be as negative as I want to be. Especially when EA DJones is disrespecting players consistently along with ignoring what concerns we have.
...Just saying.
...Just saying.
Sorry for the confusion, but I was replying directly to the OP. They gave absolutely no useful information whatsoever. How (providing CG did actually listen and act on good feedback) is anything the OP said useful?
Nothing I wrote was directed at your comments. Nor do I have any particular bone to pick or particularly disagree with anything you wrote.
My Bad. But, he can still complain and be negative.
I don't have any issues with people complaining, there's plenty to complain about. However, a post that just randomly scathes without any real context is lazy and a waste of everyone's time. Especially, when it's a little on the abusive side.
I have a lot more respect for posters that list what they feel is wrong and ways that it could be improved; even if I don't agree with the improvements.
Capital Games Team
