"Mzee;c-1240770" wrote:
"leef;c-1238933" wrote:
"BrtStlnd;c-1238922" wrote:
"Mzee;c-1238825" wrote:
It was poor timing. Dark side already are getting stomped on, and this makes it worse. Dark Side are inferior in every aspect of the game already, and dark side users in my guild (including me) are understandably very upset.
And, for everyone saying DS will get their event in the future, it seems likely, but there is no guarantee, and when will it come out? 6 months, a year? Unless there was an announcement this argument just isn't one right now.
Exactly. Saying “well you’ll get one in the future” isn’t a valid response because 1) you don’t know that 2) am I supposed to be not disappointed because MAYBE in another year I can finally use the best characters on my roster?
The fact that dark side characters are not up to par competitively with light side is already frustrating enough, but they seem intent on not just maintaining that gap, but making the it bigger.
Well, if you think dark side is that much worse than light side already, wouldn't that also mean that it's very fortunate that TB is light side?
I'm one of the people who believes there's bound to be a DS TB, so making the first 1 LS makes perfect sence to me. More LS characters ingame, large rebel faction so that alot of players meet the restrictions for specific battles rather easily (obviously not the cpt han, HRsoldier ones ofcourse). Pretty much just easier across the board for your average player than a DS TB map.
I can only guess why they didn't just make it DS and LS, wich is kinda lame that they didn't, but maybe they thought having to have DS teams aswell would make it too difficult to get a team together for DS restrictions aswell. I don't know. One thing is for sure though, DS is gonna suck for a whole lot more people than LS.
Amplify an existing imbalance issue between the 2 sides sounds like a good decision... This is the way I see it. I'd rather they work on lessening the issue instead.
That's another way of looking at it.
To me that sounds like hypothetically wanting to use bounty hunters / resistance (6 man faction) instead of empire / jedi (15/18 man faction) to unlock R2D2 / yoda because of the imballance between the two factions.
I'm not really into that whole DS vs LS stuff though, so for me it doesn't matter whether a toon is LS or DS. Having lots of toons to choose from in events/game modes that have character restrictions is favourable imo, especially in game modes.
The credit heist for example requires scoundrels instead of just bounty hunters and 3 out of 5 legendary events are restricted to the larger factions ingame. I'm pretty sure that is to make those events more accessible for the players, not (just) because there's a "LS/rebel bias".
