Another disappointing mod

"cannonfodder_iv;c-1888475" wrote:
@Mephisto_style How big of a sample size do you need though? I have 500+ rolls tracked and speed procs at a 20% rate over that sample. I would have expected 25% as you said. It's possible that I'm on a bad trend (expecting 125, got 100), not a stats person to know how big of a sample I need and too lazy to figure it out.

This is also almost exclusively speed sets. I wouldn't be surprised if speed secondaries roll lower on speed sets than on other sets in order to equalize the value of each mod set over time. Meaning that the 10% base speed increase can be made up over time with non speed sets. This would be awesome, if true, because of the benefits of other primary sets (especially offense and health).

This got me thinking of how I might track mods and mod rolls. It seems to me that you'd have to track chance to proc and chance to roll a bit differently.

• Mod 1 secondaries: Speed, Offense, Offense %, Health
  
• Mod 2 secondaries: Protection, Potency, Offense, Tenacity
  

First, proc. Would this be per mod as such:

• Speed Procs: 1/2
  
• Offense Procs: 2/2
  
• Defense Procs: 0/2
  
• etc.
  

Or per secondary slot as such (I think this way is probably right):

• Speed Procs: 1/1 (rolled on the first chance, removed from the possibility for the next 3 chances)
  
• Offense Procs: 1/2 (mod 1), 1/3 (mod 2)
  
• Offense % Procs: 1/3
  
• Health: 1/4
  
• Protection: 1/1
  
• Defense: 0/8
  
• etc.
  

???

Then rolls... For rolls, I think you'd need rolls and chances to roll side by side.

• Mod 1 rolls 2 Offense, 2 Health
  
• Mod 2 rolls 1 Offense, 3 Tenacity
  

Would be tracked as such:

• Speed Rolls: 0/4
  
• Offense Rolls: 3/8
  
• Health Rolls: 2/4
  
• Tenacity Rolls: 3/4
  
• All others present: 0/4
  
• Defense: 0/0 (and all others not present)
  

???

Is any of this right? If it is then I think I'll pass on tracking mod rolls. Seems like a lot of work. :/

Edit for formatting.