Forum Discussion
5 Replies
- Mephisto_style6 years agoSeasoned Ace
"jayjonbeach;d-222125" wrote:
Just wondering if he would be viable like G10 or G11 apparently has a large health pool. I'm in need of a Sith asap, this is why the question 3 or 4 star.
TIA
His kit is all about direct and AOE damage (second part I think). He gives 0 debuffs.
So by having him in a FO unit at 3/4 on a g12 7* is like having wicket 3/4 * on an Ewok team. Although Wicket's kit is a lot better I think
The damage will be low - treebunner6 years agoNew Spectator
"Mephisto_style;c-2041270" wrote:
"jayjonbeach;d-222125" wrote:
Just wondering if he would be viable like G10 or G11 apparently has a large health pool. I'm in need of a Sith asap, this is why the question 3 or 4 star.
TIA
His kit is all about direct and AOE damage (second part I think). He gives 0 debuffs.
So by having him in a FO unit at 3/4 on a g12 7* is like having wicket 3/4 * on an Ewok team. Although Wicket's kit is a lot better I think
The damage will be low
He stated he needed a sith . You think he needs one for a FO team or a sith one mephisto? - Mephisto_style6 years agoSeasoned Ace
"Treeburner;c-2041335" wrote:
"Mephisto_style;c-2041270" wrote:
"jayjonbeach;d-222125" wrote:
Just wondering if he would be viable like G10 or G11 apparently has a large health pool. I'm in need of a Sith asap, this is why the question 3 or 4 star.
TIA
His kit is all about direct and AOE damage (second part I think). He gives 0 debuffs.
So by having him in a FO unit at 3/4 on a g12 7* is like having wicket 3/4 * on an Ewok team. Although Wicket's kit is a lot better I think
The damage will be low
He stated he needed a sith . You think he needs one for a FO team or a sith one mephisto?
My writing FO wasn't my point. In a Sith or FO team a 3/4* ST is going to hit like a wet noodle - treebunner6 years agoNew SpectatorSeen vids of 3* g11 hitting 80k aoe not too bad
- Mephisto_style6 years agoSeasoned Ace
"Treeburner;c-2041421" wrote:
Seen vids of 3* g11 hitting 80k aoe not too bad
Then I am definitely wrong