"danrussoa;c-1158688" wrote:
I have said the same thing since I joined the game, this isn't a new.thing for me to say collusion in arena is garbage.
The underlying issue is most believe they are entitled to those crystals and they are not. Furthermore, the bully targeting payoffs is doing NOTHING wrong within the game, yet the in crowds label him something negative and target him, because he doesn't agree. Who is actually the bully??? I am also fairly certain EA would rather have people spending on refreshing.
I am on record as saying why allow the opponents on an arena shard free access to resources to make their teams harder to beat. It is illogical.
Cool, dude. I'm glad you're here to fight the good fight. I hope your tireless efforts don't go unrewarded.
The underlying issue, is that, well, that's just like your opinion, man. I agree, the bully targeting payoffs is doing nothing wrong, as far as game mechanics go. However, this indeed somewhat of a social game, and if said bully wants to go down that road, so be it. Conversely, the people cooperating to mitigate the risks of sniping are also doing nothing wrong. They are both equally valid ways to play the game. Just because you don't like one way doesn't make it wrong, it just means that you don't like it.
Yes, I'm sure EA would rather have people paying for crystals. The player base at large would rather use them for almost anything else other than arena refreshes. Which leads to the impetus of the topic to begin with; perhaps the underlying design behind arena could change for the better. I don't think the proposed solution will help, and it's a little late in the life of the game to do much about it.
