Clones vs. Padmé
Thanks CG for making it so that clones can't even take down one toon vs. Padmé. Genius.🙄
Forum Discussion
78 Replies
"thecarterologist958;c-2036843" wrote:
"MasterJediBrian;c-2036542" wrote:
No, I don't complain about that stuff, you're going to have teams with specialities and overall superiority,"MasterJediBrian;c-2036542" wrote:
I find it very disappointing that they're not even able to weaken Padme even a tiny bit for a 2nd battle.
I mean this says it all. You have been shown it's possible, and yet you still claim to believe it isn't. You have been given advice for alternative tactics, but dismissed them as wrong due to hearsay. You have agreed that teams having features that stop them being defeated by other teams is reasonable, but complain when it's about a team you have worked on. This is just hypocrisy, if you want to beat Padme, use a different team or ask for help with what you have, don't assume your mods and strategy are perfect.
In your rush to judgment, you've botched the timeline of events. My point was that Shaak & the clones (w/o ARC) are absolutely worthless vs Padme. Not just inferior, but a cruel joke you can set on auto and fall asleep to everytime, never worrying about even getting scratched.
After this point, a couple people said they won with ARC. Against a full r7 Padme team, I'd still like to see it to believe it. There's no hypocrisy in saying you can live with a squad being inferior, but that you feel their quality & tier warrant at least a minimal threat to 1 or 2 toons. Playing "who can lay down the fastest with no accomplishment whatsoever" may be your ideal game design, not mine."JDIII;c-2036590" wrote:
"MasterJediBrian;c-2036521" wrote:
"littleMAC77;c-2036515" wrote:
How is this thread about a bad player blaming game design as the reason why his B-level squad couldnt touch a meta level squad (that is also a hard counter to said b squad) still going?
You indeed are "little". You're proving my point, albeit unwittingly. The clones CAN touch metas (that are harder to farm than Padme), but against her all we get is a running joke. There's no point in even beginning the match. But if that's the pinnacle of your game theory aspirations, I understand. When I was 6, I had similar ones.
I haven’t seen a single Clone team in top 100 against meta teams (DR/Malk, GAS, Padme, GG variant squads). Clones are a C squad, very low B
And I've taken #1 before. They're an excellent tier 2 team than can punch up on tier 1 teams like r7 JKR & with a lot of luck, Malak too."MasterJediBrian;c-2036876" wrote:
"JDIII;c-2036590" wrote:
"MasterJediBrian;c-2036521" wrote:
"littleMAC77;c-2036515" wrote:
How is this thread about a bad player blaming game design as the reason why his B-level squad couldnt touch a meta level squad (that is also a hard counter to said b squad) still going?
You indeed are "little". You're proving my point, albeit unwittingly. The clones CAN touch metas (that are harder to farm than Padme), but against her all we get is a running joke. There's no point in even beginning the match. But if that's the pinnacle of your game theory aspirations, I understand. When I was 6, I had similar ones.
I haven’t seen a single Clone team in top 100 against meta teams (DR/Malk, GAS, Padme, GG variant squads). Clones are a C squad, very low B
To fully respond to his claim you need to show what the top 20 of your shard looks like."jhbuchholz;c-2036877" wrote:
"MasterJediBrian;c-2036876" wrote:
"JDIII;c-2036590" wrote:
"MasterJediBrian;c-2036521" wrote:
"littleMAC77;c-2036515" wrote:
How is this thread about a bad player blaming game design as the reason why his B-level squad couldnt touch a meta level squad (that is also a hard counter to said b squad) still going?
You indeed are "little". You're proving my point, albeit unwittingly. The clones CAN touch metas (that are harder to farm than Padme), but against her all we get is a running joke. There's no point in even beginning the match. But if that's the pinnacle of your game theory aspirations, I understand. When I was 6, I had similar ones.
I haven’t seen a single Clone team in top 100 against meta teams (DR/Malk, GAS, Padme, GG variant squads). Clones are a C squad, very low B
To fully respond to his claim you need to show what the top 20 of your shard looks like."MasterJediBrian;c-2036874" wrote:
In your rush to judgment, you've botched the timeline of events. My point was that Shaak & the clones (w/o ARC) are absolutely worthless vs Padme. Not just inferior, but a cruel joke you can set on auto and fall asleep to everytime, never worrying about even getting scratched.
After this point, a couple people said they won with ARC. Against a full r7 Padme team, I'd still like to see it to believe it. There's no hypocrisy in saying you can live with a squad being inferior, but that you feel their quality & tier warrant at least a minimal threat to 1 or 2 toons. Playing "who can lay down the fastest with no accomplishment whatsoever" may be your ideal game design, not mine.
In your rush to deny me any ground in this debate, you failed to realise I was providing examples of your obtuse nature, not a comprehensive chronology of this thread. Also I'm well aware that is your point, my counter is that there is no reason it shouldn't be when Padme is designed to oppose the features clones use to deal damage, it's a similar situation with geos, and with CLS against KRU, which I recall you agreeing was acceptable, that is where the hypocrisy lies.
It is also backwards thinking to say a team should beat something because they are good, when the fact they can't beat something is an argument against them being good, it's like saying "Ewoks are the best team in the game, so why do I keep losing with them?" Oh and just a side note, my ideal game design for this is one where you actually need to think before you play and invest, not just work on one team and expect it to demolish everything as you have.
TL/DR"MasterJediBrian;c-2036876" wrote:
They're an excellent tier 2 team
Padme is tier 1, you shouldn't expect to win."Treeburner;c-2036847" wrote:
It's doable . It's difficult and unless you know what your doing and have a decent rng it's okay.
I basically had to 4 Vs 1 with only rex and turret left and still won . After fives sacrifices rex having 300k+ h/p and 580+ speed it's not long before each nuke.
DM me it's possible to learn such power , but not from a Jedi
We’re you using Arc Trooper?"Baby_Yoda;c-2036880" wrote:
"MasterJediBrian;c-2036876" wrote:
"JDIII;c-2036590" wrote:
"MasterJediBrian;c-2036521" wrote:
"littleMAC77;c-2036515" wrote:
How is this thread about a bad player blaming game design as the reason why his B-level squad couldnt touch a meta level squad (that is also a hard counter to said b squad) still going?
You indeed are "little". You're proving my point, albeit unwittingly. The clones CAN touch metas (that are harder to farm than Padme), but against her all we get is a running joke. There's no point in even beginning the match. But if that's the pinnacle of your game theory aspirations, I understand. When I was 6, I had similar ones.
I haven’t seen a single Clone team in top 100 against meta teams (DR/Malk, GAS, Padme, GG variant squads). Clones are a C squad, very low B
And I've taken #1 before. They're an excellent tier 2 team than can punch up on tier 1 teams like r7 JKR & with a lot of luck, Malak too.
Without Anakin the team is C+ B
You've been wrong like 6 times in row... You actually don't want to use Anakin vs. JKR. Clone Sarge or Zarriss will do job much better. CS with excellent tm & damage off his basic, and Zarriss to essentially ensure Rex is around to AA opposition. Now grab a chocolate milk!!"MasterJediBrian;c-2036883" wrote:
You've been wrong like 6 times in row... You actually don't want to use Anakin vs. JKR. Clone Sarge or Zarriss will do job much better. CS with excellent tm & damage off his basic, and Zarriss to essentially ensure Rex is around to AA opposition. Now grab a chocolate milk!!
Don't you have a thread complaining that Barriss isn't useful enough?"thecarterologist958;c-2036881" wrote:
"MasterJediBrian;c-2036874" wrote:
In your rush to judgment, you've botched the timeline of events. My point was that Shaak & the clones (w/o ARC) are absolutely worthless vs Padme. Not just inferior, but a cruel joke you can set on auto and fall asleep to everytime, never worrying about even getting scratched.
After this point, a couple people said they won with ARC. Against a full r7 Padme team, I'd still like to see it to believe it. There's no hypocrisy in saying you can live with a squad being inferior, but that you feel their quality & tier warrant at least a minimal threat to 1 or 2 toons. Playing "who can lay down the fastest with no accomplishment whatsoever" may be your ideal game design, not mine.
In your rush to deny me any ground in this debate, you failed to realise I was providing examples of your obtuse nature, not a comprehensive chronology of this thread. Also I'm well aware that is your point, my counter is that there is no reason it shouldn't be when Padme is designed to oppose the features clones use to deal damage, it's a similar situation with geos, and with CLS against KRU, which I recall you agreeing was acceptable, that is where the hypocrisy lies.
It is also backwards thinking to say a team should beat something because they are good, when the fact they can't beat something is an argument against them being good, it's like saying "Ewoks are the best team in the game, so why do I keep losing with them?" Oh and just a side note, my ideal game design for this is one where you actually need to think before you play and invest, not just work on one team and expect it to demolish everything as you have.
TL/DR"MasterJediBrian;c-2036876" wrote:
They're an excellent tier 2 team
Padme is tier 1, you shouldn't expect to win.
You misrepresent people so well, you should be a lawyer. I never said I expected to win. And in the other matches, you say are similar, some casualties are possible."MasterJediBrian;c-2036886" wrote:
"thecarterologist958;c-2036881" wrote:
"MasterJediBrian;c-2036874" wrote:
In your rush to judgment, you've botched the timeline of events. My point was that Shaak & the clones (w/o ARC) are absolutely worthless vs Padme. Not just inferior, but a cruel joke you can set on auto and fall asleep to everytime, never worrying about even getting scratched.
After this point, a couple people said they won with ARC. Against a full r7 Padme team, I'd still like to see it to believe it. There's no hypocrisy in saying you can live with a squad being inferior, but that you feel their quality & tier warrant at least a minimal threat to 1 or 2 toons. Playing "who can lay down the fastest with no accomplishment whatsoever" may be your ideal game design, not mine.
In your rush to deny me any ground in this debate, you failed to realise I was providing examples of your obtuse nature, not a comprehensive chronology of this thread. Also I'm well aware that is your point, my counter is that there is no reason it shouldn't be when Padme is designed to oppose the features clones use to deal damage, it's a similar situation with geos, and with CLS against KRU, which I recall you agreeing was acceptable, that is where the hypocrisy lies.
It is also backwards thinking to say a team should beat something because they are good, when the fact they can't beat something is an argument against them being good, it's like saying "Ewoks are the best team in the game, so why do I keep losing with them?" Oh and just a side note, my ideal game design for this is one where you actually need to think before you play and invest, not just work on one team and expect it to demolish everything as you have.
TL/DR"MasterJediBrian;c-2036876" wrote:
They're an excellent tier 2 team
Padme is tier 1, you shouldn't expect to win.
You misrepresent people so well, you should be a lawyer. I never said I expected to win. And in the other matches, you say are similar, some casualties are possible.
Then the point of this thread is that you'd like to... lose less decisively? ?
