Give Lord Vader Merciless Massacare
Dear cg one simple but powerful change to make Lord Vader not garbage.(give him the Merciless Massacare ability with his ultimate) been playing this game for 4 years waiting for the chance to play as ...
Forum Discussion
"Sithlords_Inc;c-2353329" wrote:"AKCarl;c-2353206" wrote:"Sithlords_Inc;c-2353153" wrote:
Because he needs his best teams to beat other teams, whereas hes able to get through LV with B-teams who wouldn't have been able to get through the other GLs.
So basically, LV is strong enough that you can't get good banners against him without using one of your best teams. The fact that the optimal play is to throw that fight and accept a two shot means that placing him on defense is most likely going to get you a hold. Seems pretty solid to me.
The reason hes picked for the 2-shot is because you can reliably 2-shot him with cheap teams like triumverate, who wont be usefull against A-teams like other GLs or GAS anyways. I haven't watched Anhalds video, but Im assuming LV got 2-shot because his other GLs (and BHs?) were either on defence or were used to beat other GLs, meaning the other GLs were seen as a bigger threat. Also Im not sure I get your logic: Sure, if youre left with 2 B-teams like Triumverate and Geos vs LV you'll lose some banners; but if you find yourself in the same scenario against lets say JMK you dont have the slightest chanse of ever clearing. I dont know about you, but Id take a permanent hold vs a 2-shot any day.
This only shows that there are several ways to clear the same board. And just because Ahnahld chose a particular way, one time, doesn't actually prove anything.
I don't know the situation, but there can just as easily be a time where it's better to use a 2 shot on kenobi or slkr for the same reasons you give for doing it to LV. Totally dependent on what each person put on defense and saved for offense.
