Nute Leadership Isn't Broken! Here is why
After the legendary video of Lando dominating with his AOE ability, many people have seem the power of a proper pairing, centered on synergy. Some players have been crying out at how Nute lead is brok...
Forum Discussion
"KamikazeRhombus;268378" wrote:"Jensxn;268350" wrote:"HanSlowMo;268318" wrote:"Plasmaj;268272" wrote:
You are torturing the English language to try to make something true. The noun is "stealthed allies." All verbs apply to that.
Anyone reading the ability understands that those bonuses are (should) applied to stealth heroes. This post is reaching very very hard. It isn't worded odd at all, and definitely isn't confusing...
Except it is, the second clause entirely lacks a noun, but has a verb. It is an incomplete clause. As a result of this, the sentence loses clarity, as there is no subject to express who "gains" anything. Even if it were applying to stealth heroes, there needs to be a pronoun after the "and" to complete the clause, making it a dependent clause
Your whole first point is based on the assumption that both clauses are independent. You just admitted they both aren't. Therefore the first point loses its validity.
The first clause itself is independent, and correct, and the second is not. The point is that if we assume the second clause is independent, then it works for the current ability, while a dependent clause means that both the description and the actual ability are broken. My post states that it is more likely that only the description is broken, not both, and the most likely answer is usually the answer. If there is a bug, then both the ability and ability description are wrong, which is rather hard to come across, since it can be assumed there is more than one person working on the abilities
