"Woodroward;c-1974286" wrote:
"Juzz;c-1974196" wrote:
Let's use the offense maximums for both sets and calculate de critical damage done in your example.
CD set
(1.7733 - 0.15)* 3.555 = 5.7708315
Off set
(1.7733) * 3.255 = 5.7720915
Sorry but I don't see CD set doing 9.21658986175115207373271889401% minus 8.4586923794507040079950233321218% more damage @ 100% CC
1.6233 * 3.255= 5.28384157 gives us what the damage is for no set. A 10% increase in damage would be 5.28384157 * 1.1 = 5.81222565.
If we take the no set number and multiply it by the % increase for each set we get:
5.28384157 * 1.0921658986175775207373281889401= 5.7708315
5.28384157 * 1.084586923794501040079950233321218 = 5.7307854742238067329826771663538
Hey look! They don't match your numbers!
Let's try using your math:
CD set does indeed do 9% more damage compared to no set in that comp and an offense set with max offense secondaries/primaries does indeed do 8% more damage compared to no set. By dividing the offense bonus by the cd bonus you can see the cc breakpoint needed to make the cd set deal more damage than the offense set, which is 91.78% cc by the way. 8.4586923794507040079950233321218/9.21658986175115207373271889401=0.91776812317040138486746003153514
The numbers you produced look like crit damage is doing about .8% more damage than an offense set to me. Which is about right. Like I said, only when cd and offense have very similar stats are they worth comparing. Otherwise the one with better stats is better.
Edit there's an obvious math error here otherwise the % number I produced would match with the numbers it was produced from. Hang on.
I'll hang on, but CD set does less damage than Off set by my calculations. You're looking the fist number as Off set and it is the CD set.
