Poe has legitimately been over-nerfed
(Please read the post before responding. I am not claiming he is useless or asking him to be returned to what he was like before.) When the initial nerf to Poe (tenacity and expose) was announced, I ...
Forum Discussion
For me the question boils down simply. If we had known that they were going to make speed leaders count round 1 AND that they were going to get rid of the turn system AND that they were going to enable characters to resist turn meter reductions... would anyone have thought Poe needed further nerfs in addition to those changes?
I think most would answer "no".
So I would simply like to see him restored to where he was before his stats were changed. Those changes are not necessary, should have never been made given the changes mentioned above, and undercut him just enough that he's lost too much effectiveness given the buffs given to faster characters.
That's what they said they were going to do. But they got their wires crossed and instead of 2 small nerfs we ended up with effectively 6 or more. Some of them should be reversed.
I think most would answer "no".
So I would simply like to see him restored to where he was before his stats were changed. Those changes are not necessary, should have never been made given the changes mentioned above, and undercut him just enough that he's lost too much effectiveness given the buffs given to faster characters.
"BatuKhan;119622" wrote:
Surely we can all agree it would be better to under-balance, monitor, and then make additional changes, than to over-balance from the word go?
That's what they said they were going to do. But they got their wires crossed and instead of 2 small nerfs we ended up with effectively 6 or more. Some of them should be reversed.
Featured Places
