"Waqui;c-1148852" wrote:
Generating three 'random' numbers twice is just as 'random' as generating two 'random' numbers thrice.
And yes, I believe CG when they state that they use the same algorithm in both cases.
"JacenRoe;c-1149096" wrote:
I always sim the max of however many need to be simmed. I get amazing pulls, and terrible ones just the same. Since it makes no difference to the drop rates I don't want to waste even a fraction of a second on superstitious nonsense. Especially when I could waste that time looking blankly at my roster, and trying to figure who to gear next.
i swear it always screws u when ur close lol
"JacenRoe;c-1149096" wrote:
I always sim the max of however many need to be simmed. I get amazing pulls, and terrible ones just the same. Since it makes no difference to the drop rates I don't want to waste even a fraction of a second on superstitious nonsense. Especially when I could waste that time looking blankly at my roster, and trying to figure who to gear next.
"Corrog;c-1149237" wrote:
To me, it's about risk management. Yes, you can get lucky, and get 20/20 by simming 20 at once, but you can also go 0/20. To me, a 0/20 is more devastating than a 0/5. And the odds of rolling two 0/5 together is lower than rolling the odds of rolling 0/10 once.
"LiamTheWise;c-1149052" wrote:"NicWester;c-1148953" wrote:
Just do them all at once. It's all the same. Just confirmation bias mixed with good old fashioned superstition.
my superstition is when i only needed 1 more piece of gear or shard and it took my like a total of 15 pulls to get the one. i swear it always screws u when ur close lol
"Barmuka_1;c-1149102" wrote:
I would share my secret but they may nerf it so imma stay quiet lol
