Or is it 4? or 5? do people really believe this? If it is really Random Number Generating there cant be a "secrete" am i wrong. There has to be a formula for pulling the data to receive your reward it shouldnt change due to the amount. If players wanna do it for their own good thats fine but dont claim its the best and only way to do it

it is the best way to do it, but not because you'll get more shards/gear that way ;)

2 at a time works best for me. And less frusterating then going all in and getting nothing Lol. But whatever floats your boat, I change it up sometimes to 3 or whatever. Really doesnt matter RNGesus does what it wants ;)

"SolidStripes;c-1148839" wrote:2 at a time works best for me. And less frusterating then going all in and getting nothing Lol. But whatever floats your boat, I change it up sometimes to 3 or whatever. Really doesnt matter RNGesus does what it wants ;)I also do 2 or 3 btw. 4 or 5 gets on my nerves quicker ^_^

Generating three 'random' numbers twice is just as 'random' as generating two 'random' numbers thrice.And yes, I believe CG when they state that they use the same algorithm in both cases.

Simming in multiples of 6 is your overall best odds!

45 Replies

AndrewISS
8 years ago
"Darlex11;c-1150065" wrote:
All I know is going 0 for 12 is FAR FAR FAR more common than going 12 of 12. I've seen 0 for 12 sims dozens of times. I have NEVER seen a 12 of 12 sim. Which, if you are following the odds monkeys saying RNG is RNG, then you should at least see that unicorn at least once. More and more I feel like it is weighted RNG, except it is not weighted in the users favor like companies like Blizzard do.

This actually only proves your lack of knowledge about probability
Oodvan
8 years ago
"AndrewIss;c-1150106" wrote:
"Darlex11;c-1150065" wrote:
All I know is going 0 for 12 is FAR FAR FAR more common than going 12 of 12. I've seen 0 for 12 sims dozens of times. I have NEVER seen a 12 of 12 sim. Which, if you are following the odds monkeys saying RNG is RNG, then you should at least see that unicorn at least once. More and more I feel like it is weighted RNG, except it is not weighted in the users favor like companies like Blizzard do.

This actually only proves your lack of knowledge about probability

I rolled 3 yahzees in a row once. But that was with real dice not on a mobile game designed to make money
JacenRoe
8 years ago
"Darlex11;c-1150065" wrote:
All I know is going 0 for 12 is FAR FAR FAR more common than going 12 of 12. I've seen 0 for 12 sims dozens of times. I have NEVER seen a 12 of 12 sim. Which, if you are following the odds monkeys saying RNG is RNG, then you should at least see that unicorn at least once. More and more I feel like it is weighted RNG, except it is not weighted in the users favor like companies like Blizzard do.

With 50/50 odds you should expect to see 0 for 12 as often as 12 for 12. But with 20/80 odds (which is the purple drop rate) then seeing 0 for twelve should be way more common. It always averages out to around 20%. So just keep simming. There is no conspiracy.
Tavanh87
8 years ago
It's all relatively the same. A few times I got 7-16 stun cuffs for doing 20 sims; majority of the days I get 0-6. RNG is RNG.
LiamTheWise
8 years ago
If i put 1 chip on red on a roulette wheel 20 times in a row or if i put 1 chip on red on 20 different wheels at once its still the same probability.
PyrrhusRex
8 years ago
"Darlex11;c-1150065" wrote:
All I know is going 0 for 12 is FAR FAR FAR more common than going 12 of 12.

As it should be, based on probability. Assuming a 20% drop chance for purple gear, you're 16777215 times more likely to see an 0-12 as a 12-12.
LiamTheWise
8 years ago
"Pyrefly;c-1150258" wrote:
"Darlex11;c-1150065" wrote:
All I know is going 0 for 12 is FAR FAR FAR more common than going 12 of 12.

As it should be, based on probability. Assuming a 20% drop chance for purple gear, you're 16777215 times more likely to see an 0-12 as a 12-12.

Quit using stats and math to prove points. How dare u ;)
Nikoms565
8 years ago
"Pyrefly;c-1150258" wrote:
"Darlex11;c-1150065" wrote:
All I know is going 0 for 12 is FAR FAR FAR more common than going 12 of 12.

As it should be, based on probability. Assuming a 20% drop chance for purple gear, you're 16777215 times more likely to see an 0-12 as a 12-12.

"It's as if millions of tin foil hats exploded in terror...then were suddenly silenced."
PyrrhusRex
8 years ago
"Nikoms565;c-1150314" wrote:
"Pyrefly;c-1150258" wrote:
"Darlex11;c-1150065" wrote:
All I know is going 0 for 12 is FAR FAR FAR more common than going 12 of 12.

As it should be, based on probability. Assuming a 20% drop chance for purple gear, you're 16777215 times more likely to see an 0-12 as a 12-12.

"It's as if millions of tin foil hats exploded in terror...then were suddenly silenced."

Yeah, just call me the Death(-by-numbers) Star.
riffinator24
New Spectator
8 years ago
https://giphy.com/gifs/yznEXxtq7wQlG?utm_source=media-link&utm_medium=landing&utm_campaign=Media%20Links&utm_term=https://giphy.com/gifs/yznEXxtq7wQlG

I can't believe that this is a post about numbers, statistics, and odds and no one has used this meme

Forum Discussion

Simming in multiples of 6 is your overall best odds!

45 Replies

About SWGOH Strategy & Tips

Related Posts

Should Having Multiple Spouses Be an Option?

Controlling multiple Sims at a time

Test Quiz (Multiple Choice)

Multiple towns?

Multiple cornucopias?

Recent Discussions

Min. requirements for Great Mothers and Morgan to be viable in GAC?

Have not played in 3 years!!

A ? Regarding $ Spent Deciders

Wat Tambor Bundle. Is it really worth it?

Ruina