Sith Marauder vs Bastila lead?

Not sure about Marauder but my Enfys was hitting for 80k towards end of arena battle v Bastilla lead

I think he'll be hella tanky, but not able to dish out much on offense. Think the Jedi will overwhelm the team before that max health reduction stacks up.

I think others stacking effects like Young Han, Nest or FOE have a much better chance of overcoming the Jedi with stacking effects have a better chance than Marauder. Now, if you want to try to time out a bastila team SiM might have a place on your team

I’ve run this with my g12 SM against a zeta 6* Bastila jedi team. Yes he’s super tanky... but doesn’t do crazy dmg. I prefer Nest in this scenario tbh.

Nice necro.
And lol.
Marauder is a fail toon. Get him to g12+, put godlike mods on him, and he's still won't do good. It's sounds good on paper with all the buffs and debuffs.
On reality, he's fail.

As soon as a Bastila Jedi team shows up in my shard I’m totally going to find out.

Can check my .gg I had SM ready. Handles Jedi comps decent and pot up allows neg stats to stick under Traya lead.

I likey.

"Roopehun;c-1602050" wrote:
I also thought about SM, but in my oppinion, he'll rather be like sith trooper: very hard to kill, sturdy rock, but its just sitting there, watching his team being slaughtered.
Once he's the only char standing, he will fall eventually, just like every other toon would.

Except unlike Sith Trooper his special hits like a truck, grants a buff to your entire squad, and on a crit reduces the target’s max health by 15%. And he’s also way faster than Sith Trooper.

I don’t have Wampa 7* yet so I use Sith Marauder in the Wampanader squad for heroic tank and he does extremely well as a substitute.

Health steal, tenacity and defense are all pretty worthless bonuses... especially against Jedi who don’t apply a bunch of debuffs.