Under-starred characters viability
I keep seeing people talk about how some characters are still viable even at 3 stars (other than things like raids and TB where 7* are required), which makes me wonder: is there any way to have an ide...
Forum Discussion
In my view it has absolutely nothing to do with whether a character is an attacker, support, or tank and everything to do with their skills and base gear stats.
Han Solo is an attacker that will do great at 5* g11 even without a zeta.
Darth nihlis is an attacker that will annihilate even at low stars.
GK is viable at 5*, and Baze at 3 or 4* ... wheres every other tank is absolutely not viable anywhere near that range.
R2 is definitely viable at 5*.
Bb8 is only viable in high end arena with JTR team.
Rex is squishy even at 7* g12, but his leader skill stays active even if he dies.
With these exceptional characters, you just need to gear them up as high as possible to make them viable. On older shards, everyone needs to be 7* g12
Han Solo is an attacker that will do great at 5* g11 even without a zeta.
Darth nihlis is an attacker that will annihilate even at low stars.
GK is viable at 5*, and Baze at 3 or 4* ... wheres every other tank is absolutely not viable anywhere near that range.
R2 is definitely viable at 5*.
Bb8 is only viable in high end arena with JTR team.
Rex is squishy even at 7* g12, but his leader skill stays active even if he dies.
With these exceptional characters, you just need to gear them up as high as possible to make them viable. On older shards, everyone needs to be 7* g12
