Ventress

Oh nevermind, I take that back. "You're" just another guy who decided to post another thread on an already beaten down topic.

Moving on.

Yeah. But that explanation doesn't really hold water because R2 is listed with all his affiliations. But let's call that the exception.
So, let's use your premise...
Ventress, in game, is listed as "Separatist". But she was only a Separatist when she was Count Dooku's apprentice. So why no Sith designation? By your explanation, that would have to be the "time period".
But rather than over complicate it. Wouldn't it be easier to say, if Ventress is the #7 all time Bounty Hunter, maybe we could just correct the mistake and add her in that group?

"Mullato;c-1489825" wrote:
Oh nevermind, I take that back. "You're" just another guy who decided to post another thread on an already beaten down topic.

Moving on.

Mulato takes no prisoners
http://i0.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/001/151/933/b94.jpg

She should be another Ventress version, a new toon. I would like the idea, but still, Aurra, Bossk or Jango should go first.

"KLCS21;c-1489832" wrote:

Ventress, in game, is listed as "Separatist". But she was only a Separatist when she was Count Dooku's apprentice. So why no Sith designation? By your explanation, that would have to be the "time period".

My understanding is when Ventress was Dooku's assassin he never taught her any Sith lore because he was obeying the rule of two. He merely taught her lesser bits of force knowledge.

"LaksonVell;c-1489833" wrote:

"Mullato;c-1489825" wrote:
Oh nevermind, I take that back. "You're" just another guy who decided to post another thread on an already beaten down topic.

Moving on.

Mulato takes no prisoners
http://i0.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/001/151/933/b94.jpg

Is he really taking no prisoners? He calls me cool, says he likes me, and agrees with my post. But because I correct his grammar, suddenly it's just another thread on a beaten down topic. That's taking no prisoners? Is it? Is it, really?

And his screen name has 2 "L"s.

"Naraic;c-1489839" wrote:

"KLCS21;c-1489832" wrote:

Ventress, in game, is listed as "Separatist". But she was only a Separatist when she was Count Dooku's apprentice. So why no Sith designation? By your explanation, that would have to be the "time period".

My understanding is when Ventress was Dooku's assassin he never taught her any Sith lore because he was obeying the rule of two. He merely taught her lesser bits of force knowledge.

I get that. And that's what I meant by not over complicating things. Because by your logic, Savage Opress shouldn't have a Sith designation. Because he played the same role under Dooku after Ventress.

"KLCS21;c-1489832" wrote:
Yeah. But that explanation doesn't really hold water because R2 is listed with all his affiliations. But let's call that the exception.
So, let's use your premise...

To be completely fair here, r2 is a legendary after all.

If we're going to return to the sith idea - she was never a Sith. She received very limited training in terms of the Force from Dooku.

It would be nice to see her 'older' version nonetheless. Dif toon with dif skills.

"KLCS21;c-1489840" wrote:

"LaksonVell;c-1489833" wrote:

"Mullato;c-1489825" wrote:
Oh nevermind, I take that back. "You're" just another guy who decided to post another thread on an already beaten down topic.

Moving on.

Mulato takes no prisoners
http://i0.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/001/151/933/b94.jpg

Is he really taking no prisoners? He calls me cool, says he likes me, and agrees with my post. But because I correct his grammar, suddenly it's just another thread on a beaten down topic. That's taking no prisoners? Is it? Is it, really?

And his screen name has 2 "L"s.

So you openly choose to be argumentive/condescending even when someone agrees with you ?

What even is the point of this thread?

A. You thought that you had a good idea and wanted to share it.

- Idea isn't original
- Been posted probably 100s of times.
- Did you honestly think that you are the first to ever come up with this? If so I applaud your lack of effort to even use the search function.

B. You are just craving attention at the moment.

- You did Instantly jump on my grammar, which is something only the most best awesome/coolest, and most most sharp/quick-witted internet thugs do.

I bet you are the most popular person in 7th grade.

C. You want people to agree with you to start some sort of rebellion, that in turn, will cause cg to act on your request.

- LOL.


Overall I give this thread a 3/10. Mildy entertaining, but bland/beaten/stale. I think you could do better if you tried tbh. Basically....

You weak brah.

"KLCS21;c-1489846" wrote:

"Naraic;c-1489839" wrote:

"KLCS21;c-1489832" wrote:

Ventress, in game, is listed as "Separatist". But she was only a Separatist when she was Count Dooku's apprentice. So why no Sith designation? By your explanation, that would have to be the "time period".

My understanding is when Ventress was Dooku's assassin he never taught her any Sith lore because he was obeying the rule of two. He merely taught her lesser bits of force knowledge.

I get that. And that's what I meant by not over complicating things. Because by your logic, Savage Opress shouldn't have a Sith designation. Because he played the same role under Dooku after Ventress.

I thought savage was a snapshot of Maul's student savage from when he had set himself up as an alternate Sith lord rather than Dooku's dark side minion?

Just my opinion.