WAI? GK taunt

9.1.1. https://forums.galaxy-of-heroes.starwars.ea.com/discussion/244510/forum-faq-by-the-players-for-the-players#latest

In a nutshell, its WAI. GK regains the Taunt immediately (when he has protection under JMK) after being dispelled, but before the buff immunity of Fracture/Isolate is applied. Bossk and Old Ben have Taunts which work the same way, and it is by design.

Obviously they don't consider it "broken".

Under JMK lead.

He shouldn't be able too at least if I haven't missed anything when I read up all abilities. Report it and record footage of it if you are able to.

"UdalCuain;c-2297498" wrote:
9.1.1. https://forums.galaxy-of-heroes.starwars.ea.com/discussion/244510/forum-faq-by-the-players-for-the-players#latest

In a nutshell, its WAI. GK regains the Taunt immediately (when he has protection under JMK) after being dispelled, but before the buff immunity of Fracture/Isolate is applied. Bossk and Old Ben have Taunts which work the same way, and it is by design.

Maybe by design, however it is a bad one that could easily be fixed with a small change in fractures order of operations.
Apply the buff immunity of fracture before dispelling buffs. "Fixed" and less questions asked.

It's working as they intended. What's to fix?

It will be changed once the next gl comes out .

"AhnaldisGOAT;c-2297532" wrote:

"scuba;c-2297516" wrote:

"UdalCuain;c-2297498" wrote:
9.1.1. https://forums.galaxy-of-heroes.starwars.ea.com/discussion/244510/forum-faq-by-the-players-for-the-players#latest

In a nutshell, its WAI. GK regains the Taunt immediately (when he has protection under JMK) after being dispelled, but before the buff immunity of Fracture/Isolate is applied. Bossk and Old Ben have Taunts which work the same way, and it is by design.

Maybe by design, however it is a bad one that could easily be fixed with a small change in fractures order of operations.
Apply the buff immunity of fracture before dispelling buffs. "Fixed" and less questions asked.

“Bad” is a point of view. I think it works logically when it’s understood.

Working logically? From your point of view.
Logically to me would be
Apply buff immunity
Dispel buffs
Apply damage
Remove tm.

I understand the mechanics of it (I was one of the first to explain why old Ben kept taunting when fractured)
Still think it is bad design to leave it.

I agree bad is a point of view.
There are many mechanics that are "bad" and not consistent that they haven't changed (and I doubt they ever will)

I would simply change it so the question stops coming up

They don't care if it keeps coming up.

"TVF;c-2297547" wrote:
They don't care if it keeps coming up.

That is obvious.