"Woodroward;c-1897530" wrote:
No, you had no valid points because you were responding to comments not directed towards you with your values.
The validity of a point is independent of who it's directed at. Oversimplified hypothetical analogy:
Woodroward to Person B: 1+1=3
Me: That's not true.
Woodroward: Sorry, I wasn't talking to you, so your objection is invalid. Everything I said is true.
(crappy analogy I know, but it's for the sake of brevity; better, lengthier analogy will be furnished if this one proves inadequate)
Not only that, but many or most of my points were actually responding directly to your comments directed at me. Once again, you take the few times I responded to a comment you made to someone else to characterize all my responses. And even those times I was quoting a comment you made towards someone else, the greater point I was making was in response to something you directed at me or directed generally.
"Woodroward;c-1897530" wrote:
Finding evidence that people have done it without gg doesn't equate to it not being unlikely.
It is when so many people did it without Grievous in such short order. Arobot19900 posted his thread and in only a few days, one person after another after another managed to duplicate it. 5 people managed to follow in his footsteps, and he himself was following a Reddit user. If it's as unlikely as you claim, it would be unlikely for even one person to post that they duplicated the feat since the majority of players don't read or post on forums.
To be clear, you characterized it as extremely unlikely with terms like "miillion attempts" and "perfect RNG." 5 people managed to replicate perfect RNG in a few days? If you had said that it was a bit difficult/slightly unlikely, requiring good mods and a few hours on average, that's arguably true. The extreme to which you characterized it as, however, does not reflect reality. Perhaps it is true for people with poor/mediocre mods, I'm not sure.
"Woodroward;c-1897530" wrote:
Now please get my words out of your mouth.
What about all the times you misunderstood or misinterpreted things I've said? Again, I admitted fault for the couple of instances where I misinterpreted you and corrected myself. You have never done the same. And most of my other readings of your statements were correct, but you use the few errors I made to characterize all of them.
"Woodroward;c-1897530" wrote:
Nothing you have said to me is valid. It's pointless troll bait. That's why I never addressed what you said.
If you misread or don't read the things I said carefully, it's easy to dismiss them as invalid. Admittedly, it's not an easy thing to do because my posts have been long-winded. Even so, you may not be able to read anything I write with a clear head ever since you took offense at something that was not intended to offend. In retrospect, it probably wasn't the best way to do what I was trying to do.
