"Woodroward;c-1901043" wrote:
I respond to an opinion saying "I disagree", you responded saying "you're wrong". Subtle nuances of words that just go right over your head. Over and over and over and over again...
Not that it matters, but I never actually said "you're wrong," in response to you or anyone else in this thread Actually, MasterSeedy was the only one who used that specific phrase in response to you, and MightyWizard said something to you to the same effect as well. But even if I had said that there'd be nothing wrong with it. Whether one says "I disagree" or "you're wrong" is irrelevant. There is nothing wrong with responding to posts that were directed toward someone else. And you do it yourself. There's nothing wrong with that either except that you pick on me for doing the same.
Hypothetical example:
Person A to Person B: Treatment X is an effective remedy for your illness.
Me: . That treatment has been completely discredited by empirical, scientific testing.
Person A to me: I wasn't talking to you, so your objection is invalid. Everything I said is true.
"Woodroward;c-1901043" wrote:
No hypocrisy on my part. Nothing incorrect in my statements. Just your glaring inability to take my corrections of your misinterpretation and insisting opinions are wrong while trying to use insufficient evidence to "prove me wrong" on the few factual things you address.
I guess you missed the couple of instances where I admitted fault and accepted your corrections. But you've misinterpreted many of my statements as well and have never admitted fault. That, as well as your own responses to posts not directed at you, is hypocrisy.
The evidence in favor of the viability of a Padme 7* unlock team without Grievous that I assume is what you claim is insufficient is solid and far stronger than your evidence against it. The feat was replicated by far too many people in far too short a period of time for it to be as unlikely to the extreme that you describe. In addition, the viability of such a team will be greatly increased the next time around with the addition of reworks.
"Woodroward;c-1901043" wrote:
I didn't get offended at anything you said.
You didn't get offended when I referenced your arena record? You did say it was "below the belt" which was not the intention but which highly suggests offense. Anyway, if you didn't, that's good and I stand corrected. I do regret that specific action but not the intent, and you did completely misinterpret the intent of that (I have still never clearly stated what that intent is).
"Woodroward;c-1901043" wrote:
So what did you accomplish here? Sowing discord and feeding your ego all because you can't recognize the conversation you are having. Please, for the love of pete realize you are not even addressing what I'm saying let alone understanding it.
I won't allow you to spew nonsense about me uncontested. What I'm trying to accomplish, and it's an ongoing process, is defending myself, correcting the record, and trying in vain to get you to stop posting here. I will concede that you have a few good points. However, you've also made many bad points and are dogged in your defense of them (which was a factor in how this all started). Moreover, you don't believe in the viability of a team without Grievous and thus only detract from and cannot contribute to the primary purpose of this thread.
Of course, nobody can stop you except yourself. What are
you trying to accomplish here? If you feel the way you feel, why are you even posting in this thread anymore except to harass me and sow the very discord you supposedly decry?
