Hi @Duck9139 and thank you for the report.
It appears that the matchmaking is correct since your guild has way more participants than the opposing guild. There is still a slight difference in GP, but not as significant as 52m.
@EA_HighCommand, thank you for your response! Like I said, I don’t want to be a pain in the a**, but I respectfully disagree. It may have chosen the match correctly per the algorithm. However, I don’t think number of participants is a relevant metric in this case. It is still strongly balanced in their favor. I don’t know how much you can see on your end, but their front zones on D were a wall of 100k+ squads and the other was a wall of 90k+ squads. We got through the 90k wall and behind it there was still a lot of 75k+, 80k+, and 90k+ teams. We are close to taking down that zone as we speak, but there is no way we will be able to take down the 100k+ wall. They had all that and were still able to decimate our D to totality. We’re quite coordinated and have been doing very well lately in TW. We were able to take down a guild that was quite a bit stronger than us in the last war. So that was a tough but still fair pairing. In my opinion, the number of participants is irrelevant because of the capability of the participants they do have to field significantly stronger teams than we can, even with a much larger number of participants on our end.
@GladOS-013, our guild leader did some research. This is what he posted in our discord:
“So I did some investigating. Our tw is really screwed up. We had 45 sign up but 17 spots open to deploy for. We should have had 22 spots. Also, there's no way we could have paired with these guys. Even if there top 5 didn't join, they'd still have over 100 mil gp”
We’re trying to find out if anyone wasn’t able to deploy or participate in combat right now.
