(Deleted by user)

(Deleted by user)

"cdee;13058486" wrote:
> @mysph1t said:

> Well can we get back on topic already? I was talking about body and limb ratio sliders.



I believe that the Sims 4 breast augmentation is pretty excellent. Even if you dress them up in a bathing suit, their cleavage is more visible as opposed to The Sims 3 and prior. I would like a more reasonable breast augmentation slider that EA provides rather than these other modded sliders. The modded sliders are absolutely ridiculous -- making the breasts look as though they are a weapon. As a woman -- a straight woman at that -- if I were interested in the female gender, I would NOT be appreciative of such enormous boobs but hey -- some people are.



I'm more into changing up the "woohoo". I know the Sims game is for a younger (teen) audience BUT "woohoo" is obviously sex AND if the player didn't realize that to begin with then they will realize it when they hop in the sheets and start giggling underneath them. The T rating technically stands for 13+ and I know if that rating stays that way instead of changing it to M for mature then EA will not provide us with more visible and more realistic places to woohoo. And visible and realistic I mean...well, I'm sure your imagination is vivid enough to figure that one out!



I believe the Sims games, at least the newer ones with all the new interactions, SHOULD cause the rating to be M for mature. Why do I believe that? Let's say a 13 year old is playing this game -- which I don't agree they should be -- the interactions in this game "whisper seductiveley, makeout, woohoo, goose" or squeezing a sim's butt in 3) are more than what a 13 year old should learning about or doing.



I think this game is targeted at the wrong audience. It is definitely good for a younger crowd if all of those interactions were not included.



Correct me if I'm wrong but I think the majority of members on this forum are old enough to undrestand what those interactions are and to even apply them in their lives. That's just my take on it. :smile:

I'm guessing that you don't know many tweeners.

> @Tryc said:
> cdee wrote: »
>
>
>
> I'm guessing that you don't know many tweeners.


On this website -- no, I don't. Or at least it's hard to tell if you're talking to a teen or not.

But -- that is not my point. My point is I don't believe -- to begin with -- that this game should be for people under 18.

I was referring to the real world. Most tweens know more than you're suggesting a teen shouldn't even know. I know that I did and that was many moons ago.