About the new content.....

"keekee53;c-17232085" wrote:

"Repo;d-965688" wrote:
I like the new content, really I do, however, please, please in the future please be more mindful of langue used to describe content. Langue used to describe some of the new content was inflammatory to some players where this was easily avoidable. The only reason I choose to update my game is the word inspired (and it barely squeaks by with me). Without that word I would not have updated. This issue tore apart the community for several days and could have been avoided had the content been referred to differently. Middle Eastern inspired set and Modest Clothing set are both unobjectionable and would have had less of a chance of causing this much distention among players while at the same time giving many players content they have been asking for. Please, in the future, consider how contents is named and described.

This is so true. I tried making this argument over and over and people were just trying to say it wasn't religious and others tried to say I had a phobia. The point was so clear to me as the wording of the item made it religious. I just don't understand how people could not see that.

Today, STILL they say MUSLIM-Inspired Muslim by definition means a follower of the religion of Islam, it is not a culture. Religion is against the forum rules. I still have issues with the devs being able to introduce religious-inspired garb and we cannot have a conversation about religion without someone closing a thread. Double standards is what I say. Inclusion is not an excuse to break your own forum rule.

This is true. I have another example of a double standard. The Monte Cristo sandwich is in the game no issues, but when I want to upload a restaurant named Bristo Monte Cristo (The restaurant was known for their Monte Cristo sandwiches) I cannot upload it because of the word Cristo which means Christ. Like why? They need to be consistent and fair.