"Cinebar;c-18054443" wrote:
I think people mean it's lacking compared to what was actually in the base games of others. Those are facts when every thing is compared.
No, it's really not a fact. It all depends on how one measures and quantifies things to make the determination that it is "lacking". That's a value judgement, making it an opinion.
You are making the same mistake as others here in concluding that your way of measuring is the "one true way". Which I assume means you have some kind of check list in your head and each thing that gets checked off counts as a point with equal weighting to each thing on that check list.
Someone else's view on it may be quite different, with completely different things on that checklist and with values for each that covers a spectrum dependent on not just whether something is "in the game" but also precisely how it has been done and/or which feature it is.
Opinion, not fact, plain and simple.
