I mean why not? A 64x64 lot wouldn't be big enough if we got an amusement park pack. The rides alone would take up a lot of space. I would definely love lot sizes this big. Eg 74x74 or 84x84. It was said recently they were testing a new feature to see if it was working.

I doubt it they seem pretty determined to give us small worlds with small lots.

"catloverplayer;d-947419" wrote:I mean why not? A 64x64 lot wouldn't be big enough if we got an amusement park pack. The rides alone would take up a lot of space.It'd be plenty big enough.I can easily imagine a Luna Park size carnival in 64x64. Ring it with a roller coaster, then there's plenty of room in the middle. https://www.melbournepoint.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Luna-Park-Map-e1427024777207.jpg

The bigger the lot and the more that's stuffed into it, the slower my computer will be able to handle it. I honestly don't see how 64x64 isn't big enough?

There is a reason for 64x64 specifically - it's a size that easily relates to hexadecimal which fills data block sizes neatly.

I don't really see the need for bigger lots. What would be better than that is if they would somehow manage to allow lots to have more than one type. Allowing the player to properly have a home/shop, or a gym/spa etc

Could the next feature their working on be lots bigger then 64x64?

moocowsrcute
7 years ago
I don't mind the 64x64 lots, atleast for living on. I can fit every activity on it. Maybe for venues though that would be nice like malls
Evie0602
7 years ago
I would be happy if we just got more 64x64 lots.
ChadSims2
Seasoned Novice
7 years ago
I doubt it they seem pretty determined to give us small worlds with small lots.
Movotti
New Spectator
7 years ago
"catloverplayer;d-947419" wrote:
I mean why not? A 64x64 lot wouldn't be big enough if we got an amusement park pack. The rides alone would take up a lot of space.
It'd be plenty big enough.

I can easily imagine a Luna Park size carnival in 64x64. Ring it with a roller coaster, then there's plenty of room in the middle.

https://www.melbournepoint.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Luna-Park-Map-e1427024777207.jpg
paradiseplanet27
Seasoned Newcomer
7 years ago
The bigger the lot and the more that's stuffed into it, the slower my computer will be able to handle it. I honestly don't see how 64x64 isn't big enough?
hiabara
7 years ago
"Movotti;c-16703876" wrote:
"catloverplayer;d-947419" wrote:
I mean why not? A 64x64 lot wouldn't be big enough if we got an amusement park pack. The rides alone would take up a lot of space.
It'd be plenty big enough.

I can easily imagine a Luna Park size carnival in 64x64. Ring it with a roller coaster, then there's plenty of room in the middle.

https://www.melbournepoint.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Luna-Park-Map-e1427024777207.jpg

I doubt we'll get bigger lots and I can imagine they would instead add a whole world (normal world or vacation world) for amusement parks with proper backgrounds.
IngeJones
7 years ago
There is a reason for 64x64 specifically - it's a size that easily relates to hexadecimal which fills data block sizes neatly.
AlbaWaterhouse
7 years ago
I don't really see the need for bigger lots. What would be better than that is if they would somehow manage to allow lots to have more than one type. Allowing the player to properly have a home/shop, or a gym/spa etc
JeanVW
Seasoned Newcomer
7 years ago
I much rather have a new world with more (smaller) lots than updating the game to cater for bigger than 64x64 lots.
drake_mccarty
7 years ago
Given the structure of the worlds it would make more sense to just build the rides into the world and not put them on a lot.