"Sigzy05;15242250" wrote:
And btw honey, if you care so much for those metacritic scores, be sure to know that the glorified trash that you call TS4 Base Game has a 3.9. user score--> http://www.metacritic.com/game/pc/the-sims-4
You do realize, it's something different when the angry (internet) mob decides to vote (impulsivly) against a game for whatever reason (look at Fallout 4) during a very short amount of time compared to reacting to an EP (longer reaction span implied) that builds on the foundation of said videogame. Sims 3 --> good score, but Generations still sucked (probably beause of the theme ;-) ).
BTW: What I described with TS4 (today it's a very modern thing to mobilize internet mobs and take part in them --> the term 'p-lumstorm' was born) was also the reason why Steam changed their rating system: You now see how people rate a particular game AFTERWARDS --> after the release (sometimes games get better with time, this especially applies to TS4 (remember http://forums.thesims.com/en_US/discussion/893117/live-service-explained/p1, Sims 3, however, only released very few patches in comparison ) ).
What I mean by that? opinions change with time. Here is a very good example: http://www.gamestar.de/spiele/die-sims-4/test/die_sims_4,49502,3235018.html (Gamestar gave TS4 another chance because they realized their concept of providing content was different from what people were used from previous iterations, an angry internet mob, however, will never revalue its score).
